Nov 27, 2008 - 2:05 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 19, '07 From Washington Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) |
ok, so some of you know I am building my own computer and at this time I am gathering all the parts that I need. I will have 4gb RAM (with the intent to expand later), so I know I will want to go with a 64-bit OS. Although I can't decide between Windows XP Pro and Windows Vista. I am used to XP, since it has been on my last few computers, although I have heard that Pro has problems with some older software. I've been reading up online about the differences and which would be a better choice, but it hasn't got me anywhere since half the reviews I read say Vista is the way to go, and the other half say XP is the better O/S to get. I don't want to spend $100+ on an Operating system, just to find out I should have gotten the other one
so, any advice or experiences you guys have had with these two would be helpful. also, I am assuming that I will want to get the software that is meant for "system builders"...? There are just way too many options on newegg with a very wide variety in price -------------------- |
![]() |
Nov 27, 2008 - 2:35 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Jun 6, '08 From Hamiltron, Ontario Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Dual booting Vista X64 and Ubuntu 8.10 X64 should cover all the bases really. Its what I am doing and I have a lot of experience with both OSes. I don't find 64-bit to be a problem unless you're trying to load software/hardware from the stone age of computing. These things will also conflict with Massive hard drives, huge resolutions, desktop composition, dual core CPUs and > 3GB of ram. So basically they're at odds with your entire hardware profile, not just the 64 bit.
You could, if you've built a lucky enough computer, be able to run OS X. Unless you're planning to build a "hackintosh" its pretty hard to have the right hardware. However OS X 10.5 is UNIX core, so its probably possible to find some really awesome people out there developing drivers for it. If you go Linux/Vista you need to install Vista first and then Linux. Unless of course you want to be messing with GRUB after the fact. -------------------- ![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination. |
96bluevert computer ? Nov 27, 2008 - 2:05 PM
lagos For a brand new system, I would go with Vista.
M... Nov 27, 2008 - 2:12 PM
stephen_lee I'd say go with XP pro, it'd be faster and... Nov 27, 2008 - 3:25 PM
96bluevert Thanks for the help guys, but after everything I j... Nov 27, 2008 - 5:02 PM
Celiracer18 go with vista 64-bit. anyone who tells you to go w... Nov 27, 2008 - 5:17 PM
96bluevert Thanks for the advice celiracer, though I already ... Nov 27, 2008 - 5:24 PM
MercuryFree Every time I have to use my girlfriend's vista... Nov 27, 2008 - 6:11 PM
97celiman i just got a new hp laptop with 4gb of RAM and i c... Nov 27, 2008 - 6:44 PM
forkee ive been using vista ever since the beta version a... Nov 27, 2008 - 7:06 PM
Taskbot Honestly, I don't see much speed improvement w... Nov 27, 2008 - 11:36 PM
96bluevert Yeah, from what I've heard Windows 7 won't... Nov 27, 2008 - 11:53 PM
Taskbot QUOTE (96bluevert @ Nov 27, 2008 - 11... Nov 28, 2008 - 10:03 AM
malpaso Windows XP... proved, patched and "bugless... Nov 28, 2008 - 3:26 AM
lagos For the first time ever, Linux has an almost perfe... Nov 28, 2008 - 3:25 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 18th, 2025 - 10:56 AM |