Nov 27, 2008 - 2:05 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 19, '07 From Washington Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) |
ok, so some of you know I am building my own computer and at this time I am gathering all the parts that I need. I will have 4gb RAM (with the intent to expand later), so I know I will want to go with a 64-bit OS. Although I can't decide between Windows XP Pro and Windows Vista. I am used to XP, since it has been on my last few computers, although I have heard that Pro has problems with some older software. I've been reading up online about the differences and which would be a better choice, but it hasn't got me anywhere since half the reviews I read say Vista is the way to go, and the other half say XP is the better O/S to get. I don't want to spend $100+ on an Operating system, just to find out I should have gotten the other one
so, any advice or experiences you guys have had with these two would be helpful. also, I am assuming that I will want to get the software that is meant for "system builders"...? There are just way too many options on newegg with a very wide variety in price -------------------- |
![]() |
Nov 27, 2008 - 5:17 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 23, '05 From Princeton, Minnesota Currently Offline Reputation: 7 (100%) |
go with vista 64-bit. anyone who tells you to go with xp because "its faster and there arent any bugs" is just hopping on the vista hating bandwagon. I have used vista for well over a year now pre SP1 and with SP1. Service pack 1 fixed near every single problem that it might have had. If you arent trying to use incredibly old programs then vista will work with them. The number one problem i see with people trying to use vista is that they are using incredibly old programs designed for windows 95/98 and 2000. the other most common problem is using it on 1-2 gigs of ram, Vista uses 1-2 gigs as sort of a cache to run commonly used programs faster. rarely used programs boot up quickly enough especially since you are planning on atleast 4 gigs.
i gotta reply faster i guess lol. Have fun dealing with XP 64 bit. i havent used it for years but i hope they have more drivers for it now This post has been edited by Celiracer18: Nov 27, 2008 - 5:20 PM -------------------- -Brian
![]() |
96bluevert computer ? Nov 27, 2008 - 2:05 PM
lagos For a brand new system, I would go with Vista.
M... Nov 27, 2008 - 2:12 PM
Taskbot Dual booting Vista X64 and Ubuntu 8.10 X64 should ... Nov 27, 2008 - 2:35 PM
stephen_lee I'd say go with XP pro, it'd be faster and... Nov 27, 2008 - 3:25 PM
96bluevert Thanks for the help guys, but after everything I j... Nov 27, 2008 - 5:02 PM
96bluevert Thanks for the advice celiracer, though I already ... Nov 27, 2008 - 5:24 PM
MercuryFree Every time I have to use my girlfriend's vista... Nov 27, 2008 - 6:11 PM
97celiman i just got a new hp laptop with 4gb of RAM and i c... Nov 27, 2008 - 6:44 PM
forkee ive been using vista ever since the beta version a... Nov 27, 2008 - 7:06 PM
Taskbot Honestly, I don't see much speed improvement w... Nov 27, 2008 - 11:36 PM
96bluevert Yeah, from what I've heard Windows 7 won't... Nov 27, 2008 - 11:53 PM
Taskbot QUOTE (96bluevert @ Nov 27, 2008 - 11... Nov 28, 2008 - 10:03 AM
malpaso Windows XP... proved, patched and "bugless... Nov 28, 2008 - 3:26 AM
lagos For the first time ever, Linux has an almost perfe... Nov 28, 2008 - 3:25 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 20th, 2025 - 12:14 PM |