![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 7, '06 From wyomissing pennsylvania Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
Just curious what everyone's opinions on these are (FI application)
for a street driven car (low throttle driving) that also see's its share pf peppy driving (wot pulls) which is "better" and why? blow off would be recirculated, and leaks not being considered, why would one choose a map system besides tunning capabilities? -------------------- you know why they put sheep at the edge of a cliff.... that way they push back!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() (2:27:32 AM) edit: please f*cking work, f*ck, sh*t, piss (2:28:08 AM) edit: that did the trick |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 7, '06 From wyomissing pennsylvania Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
good stuff
everyone seems to say that going map is a cure all... but ive always thought that maf was "better" for the extent of what i use a car for - going around town with peppy driving. i guess one of the largest "selling points" to map setups are that cold days arent near the problem they are with maf - but if its not a car that needs to be reliable 100% of the time then seems negligable to me - i can just wait for it to warm up or other pita fixes anyone know of any descent resources off hand that delve further into this? -------------------- you know why they put sheep at the edge of a cliff.... that way they push back!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() (2:27:32 AM) edit: please f*cking work, f*ck, sh*t, piss (2:28:08 AM) edit: that did the trick |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: August 20th, 2025 - 10:33 AM |