![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 7, '06 From wyomissing pennsylvania Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
Just curious what everyone's opinions on these are (FI application)
for a street driven car (low throttle driving) that also see's its share pf peppy driving (wot pulls) which is "better" and why? blow off would be recirculated, and leaks not being considered, why would one choose a map system besides tunning capabilities? -------------------- you know why they put sheep at the edge of a cliff.... that way they push back!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() (2:27:32 AM) edit: please f*cking work, f*ck, sh*t, piss (2:28:08 AM) edit: that did the trick |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 7, '06 From wyomissing pennsylvania Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
ive read that what you said is contradictory
maf = better acceptance to mods map = more persnickety to mods because when you change something on a map setup - you HAVE to get it retuned to update the charts on a maf system, you can within reason change parts and not have to change since its sensing actual values - instead of predicted values since you switched to map and got it tuned - i wouldnt count that as a strike against maf. id bet had you simply gotten the re-tune while on the maf your car would still run fine enough - minus the cost of switching personally i think ill stick to a maf setup and just upgrade accordingly if problems arise that cannot be easily fixed. -------------------- you know why they put sheep at the edge of a cliff.... that way they push back!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() (2:27:32 AM) edit: please f*cking work, f*ck, sh*t, piss (2:28:08 AM) edit: that did the trick |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: August 20th, 2025 - 10:32 AM |