6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> MAF vs MAP
post May 27, 2009 - 2:14 PM
+Quote Post
jason



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 7, '06
From wyomissing pennsylvania
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




Just curious what everyone's opinions on these are (FI application)

for a street driven car (low throttle driving) that also see's its share pf peppy driving (wot pulls) which is "better" and why?

blow off would be recirculated, and leaks not being considered, why would one choose a map system besides tunning capabilities?


--------------------
you know why they put sheep at the edge of a cliff.... that way they push back!
IPB Image
IPB Image
IPB Image
IPB Image
(2:27:32 AM) edit: please f*cking work, f*ck, sh*t, piss
(2:28:08 AM) edit: that did the trick
 
Start new topic
Replies
post May 29, 2009 - 11:01 PM
+Quote Post
lagos



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 31, '02
From Philadelphia, PA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




QUOTE (pittfirefighter @ May 29, 2009 - 6:46 PM) *
one tuner, this is complete speculation, thought that it could be the gt2871r, it was pulling a lot more air than the stock turbo, going past the threshold that the MAF was supposed to be operating within



This is why. the 2871 makes a good 40-50hp more at the same boost level then the ct26. On the ct26, i have personally seen different air flow values and a/f ratios at 7psi and 12psi. after that, it just keeps the same air flow reading.


QUOTE (Fastbird @ May 29, 2009 - 7:02 PM) *
Art, this is far from a silly topic. This is general tuning stuff that no matter the application has value.


Its a silly topic because its too general. You cant say a one is better then the other in a general sense, and that everyone, regardless of what car they are in, should ditch their setup for the clear winner.

Take a look at the evo and sti guys. Their cars come with mafs located preturbo. Now by all accounts this is great, the maf should account for changes in VE and everything should be fine no matter what minor bolt ons you do to the car. However this is not the case. Those guys (expecially subaru guys) run into all kinds of trouble just from installing an intake. Seems simple things like that throw off their highly sensitive hot wire systems giving them all kinds of drivebility problems. So why dont all those guys just convert to map? Because they have fully programmable ecu's and can simple change their tune to account for the difference in air flow reading. in that cause, it actually makes no sense to convert the car to a map system just to fix what is essentially a maf related problem.

point is... work with what you got. the real problem is not so much the sensor, but the ability to retune your stock fuel maps to account for your new mods. Only at very high hp levels will you see some sensors run out of resolution, and at that point, you will be on a stand alone ecu, and will be able to convert to the type of sensor that suits your needs (generally map).

This post has been edited by lagos: May 29, 2009 - 11:17 PM


--------------------
15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned

Posts in this topic
- jason   MAF vs MAP   May 27, 2009 - 2:14 PM
- - Fastbird   Actually your typical MAF based system is easier t...   May 27, 2009 - 2:33 PM
- - lagos   map   May 27, 2009 - 3:53 PM
- - presure2   fastbird pretty much hit the nail on the head.   May 27, 2009 - 5:09 PM
- - jason   got this elsewhere. all i know.. is that when i ha...   May 28, 2009 - 9:25 AM
- - Fastbird   Wild would be LOTS of boost essentially, cams, ect...   May 28, 2009 - 10:26 AM
- - jason   good stuff everyone seems to say that going map i...   May 28, 2009 - 10:49 AM
- - lagos   what car are you talking about?   May 28, 2009 - 1:53 PM
- - jason   none specifically - was in discussion seems like ...   May 28, 2009 - 3:05 PM
- - Fastbird   VERY easy to circumvent VTA BOV issues on a MAF ca...   May 28, 2009 - 3:22 PM
- - pittfirefighter   theres issues with the MAF sensor on the 3sgte goi...   May 28, 2009 - 6:34 PM
- - jason   ive read that what you said is contradictory maf ...   May 29, 2009 - 2:17 PM
- - lagos   I cant help to think that this is such a silly top...   May 29, 2009 - 2:32 PM
- - pittfirefighter   just on my 3sgte - the gate style MAF sensor... wh...   May 29, 2009 - 3:30 PM
- - lagos   QUOTE (pittfirefighter @ May 29, 2009 - ...   May 29, 2009 - 4:41 PM
- - pittfirefighter   yes i logged it on my AEM EMS but before my AEM UE...   May 29, 2009 - 5:46 PM
- - Fastbird   Art, this is far from a silly topic. This is gene...   May 29, 2009 - 6:02 PM
- - lagos   QUOTE (pittfirefighter @ May 29, 2009 - ...   May 29, 2009 - 11:01 PM
- - Fastbird   Art, I don't think anyone is saying that it...   May 30, 2009 - 12:02 AM
- - presure2   IMO basicly, the MAF is fine, 1st provided it is i...   May 30, 2009 - 6:59 AM
- - Fastbird   Unless you're like me and just want the unsigh...   May 30, 2009 - 7:07 AM
- - lagos   QUOTE (presure2 @ May 30, 2009 - 7:5...   May 30, 2009 - 9:36 AM
- - Fastbird   QUOTE (lagos @ May 30, 2009 - 9:36 A...   May 30, 2009 - 6:52 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: June 27th, 2025 - 5:17 PM