MAF vs MAP Options

[jason]

Just curious what everyone's opinions on these are (FI application)

for a street driven car (low throttle driving) that also see's its share pf peppy driving (wot pulls) which is "better" and why?

blow off would be recirculated, and leaks not being considered, why would one choose a map system besides tunning capabilities?

[Fastbird]

Art, I don't think anyone is saying that it's better to ditch one or the other. I made that pointedly clear that depending on the capabilities of the components being used you can go either way. Admittedly there's going to be different situations on different vehicles, but the overall concept remains the same.

I disagree about the sensor not being the real problem though. The sensor is a VERY big part of the system/problem though because it's only good for a predetermined range, and once that is exceeded then you're essentially screwed for that particular component. This is what drives the switch to a MAP based system the better part of the time. Tuning it is only half the battle. Even with an AEM on the 3S with an AFM like PittFireFighter has with the GT28721R, there's nothing you can do about it because the sensor itself is maxed out. You absolutely need the hardware to support what you're doing in addition to the software capabilities.