![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 7, '06 From wyomissing pennsylvania Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
Just curious what everyone's opinions on these are (FI application)
for a street driven car (low throttle driving) that also see's its share pf peppy driving (wot pulls) which is "better" and why? blow off would be recirculated, and leaks not being considered, why would one choose a map system besides tunning capabilities? -------------------- you know why they put sheep at the edge of a cliff.... that way they push back!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() (2:27:32 AM) edit: please f*cking work, f*ck, sh*t, piss (2:28:08 AM) edit: that did the trick |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) ![]() |
IMO basicly, the MAF is fine, 1st provided it is in good working order (these 3sgte AFM's are getting OLD...) and 2nd provided you stay within its working range. IE: in the case of a 3s, once you get out of its range, you get what pitt got.
once you hit that threshold, your pretty much done. with the map, you dont really have that "threshold" only the limit of what the map will read. (which in most aftermarket cases never gets seen with a 3 or 5 bar map that some of the guys are using.) as long as your staying within the factory "margin of adjustment" with a MAF, IMO there is no downside to it, untill you go out of that range. -------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
![]() 13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: August 20th, 2025 - 5:38 PM |