 Toyota GT-Four ST205 Vs Mitsubishi Evo, Which is the better car? Performance, Technology, etc. |
 Sep 17, 2009 - 9:35 AM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Feb 11, '08 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%)  |
What do you guys think??
GT4 or EVO? I want to have a discussion about this without further hijacking Jim's thread from http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...1364&st=260 -------------------- Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC 269awhp / 273ft-lbs |
 |
Replies
|
Sep 17, 2009 - 9:43 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 11, '08 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
So stock for stock, ST205 and Evo 4 or 5 lets say (for a similar year comparison)
Pros for Evo: Evo is 200 kgs lighter they have 280BHP as opposed to 250BHP 4WD system is more advanced?? Cons for Evo: They don't seem to look as aerodynamic (maybe) FMIC not W2A? Can't run 20psi on stock head & block? What about suspension? Do they have something better than superstrut? I guess we have to talk about street application now, since TTE didn't want superstrut for rally.. Superstrut really is "the sh*t" on the street btw, you can full throttle through negative camber corners (both SS-III and GT4) which would normally understeer you off the road in a nonsuperstrut SS-I or II. This post has been edited by delusionz: Sep 17, 2009 - 9:47 AM -------------------- Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC 269awhp / 273ft-lbs |
Posts in this topic
delusionz Toyota GT-Four ST205 Vs Mitsubishi Evo Sep 17, 2009 - 9:35 AM
Nartanian I favor the Evo, so I'll stick with that. Tech... Sep 17, 2009 - 9:42 AM spolski07 there is an evoIX here in town that runs almost 90... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:44 AM lagos QUOTE Cons for Evo:
They don't seem to look as... Sep 17, 2009 - 2:51 PM
95st-celica QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 3:51 P... Sep 17, 2009 - 3:14 PM Culpable04 QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 3:51 P... Sep 17, 2009 - 3:12 PM SwissFerdi I think a GT-4 is a little closer to all of our he... Sep 17, 2009 - 3:40 PM Cuts_the_Pilot year for year gtfour is better.
but unfortunatly ... Sep 17, 2009 - 6:22 PM lagos QUOTE (Cuts_the_Pilot @ Sep 17, 2009 - 7... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:30 PM bdub215 QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 11:30 ... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:47 PM Nartanian I think a stock 1990-1992 6-bolt 4g63 could hold a... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:57 PM x_itchy_b_x Both cars are pretty evenly matched. a better comp... Sep 18, 2009 - 12:40 AM 95st-celica (and itcy comes out of no where)
nice to see your... Sep 18, 2009 - 12:57 AM lagos QUOTE (95st-celica @ Sep 18, 2009 ... Sep 18, 2009 - 6:43 AM delusionz One of the guys discussing in Jims thread (I linke... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:26 PM delusionz And obviously we can't compare the new millenn... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:33 PM tin_foil I'm not near as informed about cars as I used ... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:56 PM 95st-celica QUOTE (tin_foil @ Sep 18, 2009 - 4:5... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:59 PM yarik83 Resurrecting this little thread here. Out of curio... Sep 26, 2009 - 10:03 PM enderswift QUOTE Resurrecting this little thread here. Out of... Dec 3, 2009 - 11:08 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 16th, 2025 - 2:06 PM |