 Toyota GT-Four ST205 Vs Mitsubishi Evo, Which is the better car? Performance, Technology, etc. |
 Sep 17, 2009 - 9:35 AM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Feb 11, '08 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%)  |
What do you guys think??
GT4 or EVO? I want to have a discussion about this without further hijacking Jim's thread from http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...1364&st=260 -------------------- Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC 269awhp / 273ft-lbs |
 |
Replies
|
Sep 17, 2009 - 3:12 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Apr 17, '06 From New Jersey Currently Offline Reputation: 105 (100%) |
QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 3:51 PM)  QUOTE Cons for Evo: They don't seem to look as aerodynamic (maybe) FMIC not W2A? Can't run 20psi on stock head & block? Huh? Who told you that? Stock boost on the evo9 is around 19psi, and most people run around 22psi. You can also reflash the stock ecu with a 50$ usb cable and open source software and have a fully tunable ecu that can run any size injector you want. Add alcohol injection and you can retune the car to make 400whp on the stock turbo. The car also stops on a dime with those massive brembo brakes, and the handling is incredible. Seriously, any car can be made to be great, but out of the box, the evo is an all round better car. he was refering to Evo 4 and 5 so the comparison was somewhat fair. Evo IX has how many year of technology on top of the ST205 ? not a fiar comparison. --------------------  |
Posts in this topic
delusionz Toyota GT-Four ST205 Vs Mitsubishi Evo Sep 17, 2009 - 9:35 AM
Nartanian I favor the Evo, so I'll stick with that. Tech... Sep 17, 2009 - 9:42 AM delusionz So stock for stock, ST205 and Evo 4 or 5 lets say ... Sep 17, 2009 - 9:43 AM spolski07 there is an evoIX here in town that runs almost 90... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:44 AM lagos QUOTE Cons for Evo:
They don't seem to look as... Sep 17, 2009 - 2:51 PM
95st-celica QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 3:51 P... Sep 17, 2009 - 3:14 PM SwissFerdi I think a GT-4 is a little closer to all of our he... Sep 17, 2009 - 3:40 PM Cuts_the_Pilot year for year gtfour is better.
but unfortunatly ... Sep 17, 2009 - 6:22 PM lagos QUOTE (Cuts_the_Pilot @ Sep 17, 2009 - 7... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:30 PM bdub215 QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 11:30 ... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:47 PM Nartanian I think a stock 1990-1992 6-bolt 4g63 could hold a... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:57 PM x_itchy_b_x Both cars are pretty evenly matched. a better comp... Sep 18, 2009 - 12:40 AM 95st-celica (and itcy comes out of no where)
nice to see your... Sep 18, 2009 - 12:57 AM lagos QUOTE (95st-celica @ Sep 18, 2009 ... Sep 18, 2009 - 6:43 AM delusionz One of the guys discussing in Jims thread (I linke... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:26 PM delusionz And obviously we can't compare the new millenn... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:33 PM tin_foil I'm not near as informed about cars as I used ... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:56 PM 95st-celica QUOTE (tin_foil @ Sep 18, 2009 - 4:5... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:59 PM yarik83 Resurrecting this little thread here. Out of curio... Sep 26, 2009 - 10:03 PM enderswift QUOTE Resurrecting this little thread here. Out of... Dec 3, 2009 - 11:08 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 20th, 2025 - 6:03 PM |