 Toyota GT-Four ST205 Vs Mitsubishi Evo, Which is the better car? Performance, Technology, etc. |
 Sep 17, 2009 - 9:35 AM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Feb 11, '08 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%)  |
What do you guys think??
GT4 or EVO? I want to have a discussion about this without further hijacking Jim's thread from http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...1364&st=260 -------------------- Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC 269awhp / 273ft-lbs |
 |
Replies
|
Sep 18, 2009 - 3:26 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 11, '08 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
One of the guys discussing in Jims thread (I linked in the 1st post) explained how Evo guys like to talk **** about GT4 and it reminded me how people talk sh*t about my ride trying to tell me a stock Evo would waste it and that noone ever sees a GT4 at the drag strip for a reason.
It always makes me wonder just how fast these Evos really are? I know my ST205 is alot quicker than my old ST202, but still I know any large engined turbo car will waste it. So just how much extra juice could Mitsubishi really get out of its identical displacement? Now I know for a fact after closely watching 3S-GTE threads in these forums that with an FCD I can safely crank 20PSI with a squirt of water, since I've had it this whole time on 18psi, there's still no play in my shaft and the engine is still running as it should, no sign of oil contamination even after 4900kms (I'm due for a change, 3s-gte oil change is every 5000kms and not 10000kms like 3sge) -------------------- Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC 269awhp / 273ft-lbs |
Posts in this topic
delusionz Toyota GT-Four ST205 Vs Mitsubishi Evo Sep 17, 2009 - 9:35 AM
Nartanian I favor the Evo, so I'll stick with that. Tech... Sep 17, 2009 - 9:42 AM delusionz So stock for stock, ST205 and Evo 4 or 5 lets say ... Sep 17, 2009 - 9:43 AM spolski07 there is an evoIX here in town that runs almost 90... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:44 AM lagos QUOTE Cons for Evo:
They don't seem to look as... Sep 17, 2009 - 2:51 PM
95st-celica QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 3:51 P... Sep 17, 2009 - 3:14 PM Culpable04 QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 3:51 P... Sep 17, 2009 - 3:12 PM SwissFerdi I think a GT-4 is a little closer to all of our he... Sep 17, 2009 - 3:40 PM Cuts_the_Pilot year for year gtfour is better.
but unfortunatly ... Sep 17, 2009 - 6:22 PM lagos QUOTE (Cuts_the_Pilot @ Sep 17, 2009 - 7... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:30 PM bdub215 QUOTE (lagos @ Sep 17, 2009 - 11:30 ... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:47 PM Nartanian I think a stock 1990-1992 6-bolt 4g63 could hold a... Sep 17, 2009 - 10:57 PM x_itchy_b_x Both cars are pretty evenly matched. a better comp... Sep 18, 2009 - 12:40 AM 95st-celica (and itcy comes out of no where)
nice to see your... Sep 18, 2009 - 12:57 AM lagos QUOTE (95st-celica @ Sep 18, 2009 ... Sep 18, 2009 - 6:43 AM delusionz And obviously we can't compare the new millenn... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:33 PM tin_foil I'm not near as informed about cars as I used ... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:56 PM 95st-celica QUOTE (tin_foil @ Sep 18, 2009 - 4:5... Sep 18, 2009 - 3:59 PM yarik83 Resurrecting this little thread here. Out of curio... Sep 26, 2009 - 10:03 PM enderswift QUOTE Resurrecting this little thread here. Out of... Dec 3, 2009 - 11:08 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 16th, 2025 - 2:05 PM |