![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 20, '08 From East Coast Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
Ok, here's a question:
Take a '99-04 Mustang GT and compare it to a '96 Celica GT. If the celica GT had a full exhaust set up and light head work along with a SRI and the mild set of webcams...how would it compare to a stock say 2001 Mustang GT? Would the celica be able to stack up even off the line if both cars were on a 1/4 mile track? Thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 27, '09 From West Coast Canada Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
NO STOP IT. you can spending ****ing 100,000 on an L4 N/A motor worth of Titanium alloy and carbon fibre Lowend (if thats even possible) parts that are super lightweight and provide little to no resistance and its still going to bank you if your lucky 40-50 HP, even if the case of a beams vvti 3s-ge running on this retarded build of stupidly overpriced useless internals you wont bank over 250whp Which still cannot compare to a 4.6L v8 making over 300.... not to mention its rear wheel drive. Please stop. Higher compression on an engine already running 10.5 is pushing it.... Infact i think even some of the v6 dual vtech acura's only run 11.2
and a larger throttle body for what? your non compressed air? you gonna give that air some fuel to fix with or run it lean? try bigger injectors... hell just for the fun of it lets throw an SAFC on there, or in the case of the vvti, V-AFC another 15-20hp. Still not going to cut it. fact of the matter is, a stock gen3 running an e153 would have a hard time against a mustang.... perhaps a gt-4 would have a fair chance. STOP IT ![]() This post has been edited by Mstoochn: Oct 17, 2009 - 8:55 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 13th, 2025 - 2:41 PM |