![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 5, '05 From pineapple under the sea Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) ![]() |
Finally.
Discuss. -------------------- 1991 MR2 - T-tops - Crimson Red - Gen3 3SGTE - Lots of money
![]() I'm not really an asshole, but I play one on the internet. **** Photobucket |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) ![]() |
Great, now we have conspiracy theorists who say either he was dead already or not dead at all. I promise you this, if he weren't dead you'd know by now.
What scientific evidence? The building didn't have to melt, it only had to buckle in the right places. Same with Building 7. It buckled. Jet fuel ignited fires, it didn't sustain them. I'm not suspicious at all. I chalk that up to common sense. People can say they heard explosions, which is funny, because there were none. Eyewitness testimony is the least reliable of any. There were no seismic recordings of explosions, the buildings didn't fall straight down (they hit several buildings around them as they fell). The Marriott World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 6 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church was practicall demolished. Besides, demolition uses implosion, not explosion. This is all stuff that the National Institute of Science & Tech went over. Everything else is pure conjecture. Some light reading: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology...842?page=5#wtc7 I've spent way to much of my work day on trying to keep people from being pulled into nonsense. Those who think all this crap still are going to forever. This post has been edited by Supersprynt: May 4, 2011 - 3:18 PM -------------------- |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 17th, 2025 - 8:39 PM |