![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 9, '08 From Blainville Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) ![]() |
I know that the 3s-ge engine has a higher compression ratio than the 3s-gte (which I guess means that the pistons' head are thiner right?), but what does it change so that we can't (or shall not) turbocharge the 3s-ge?
Is it because it would (I don't know) be too much compressed exhaust gases for the turbo to hold? BTW: what does the last number in the compression ratio mean? (Like in 10:3:1) This post has been edited by dudeofchaos: Jun 26, 2011 - 10:51 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 11, '08 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Beams head on my engine would be cool, but very doubtful i would be able to achieve any improvement (probably a loss due to that NA cam spec ****)
lol my turbo is already 0 lag, spoolup starts at 2200 and full boost by 2800.... with ballbearing full boost already happens at the tip of the pedal so cant get much better response than that... -------------------- Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC 269awhp / 273ft-lbs |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 8th, 2025 - 1:56 PM |