![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 3, '11 From Ohio Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) ![]() |
My initial thoughts on this would be to make some clear (as to not detract significantly from the look of the car) body panels to improve aerodynamic efficiency... but I have a separate thread for that http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...mp;#entry928769
I post here however to discuss engine mods. Any ideas or thoughts on this? I was thinking of maybe advancing the ignition timing a bit to burn hotter, increase hp and hopefully mpg, but idk. Does a good CAI help? or a larger O.D. exhaust? What have you guys done? -------------------- ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 18, '05 From Calgary Currently Offline Reputation: 20 (100%) ![]() |
in terms of exhaust diameters for ideal flow, this graph should give you an idea.
![]() (Source) also for the same amount of hp, the turbocharged engine will consume less fuel than the NA version. so as long as you don't alter your driving style, you will save more fuel with the turbocharged version. -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 3, '11 From Ohio Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) ![]() |
in terms of exhaust diameters for ideal flow, this graph should give you an idea. ![]() (Source) also for the same amount of hp, the turbocharged engine will consume less fuel than the NA version. so as long as you don't alter your driving style, you will save more fuel with the turbocharged version. That kinda tells me that for a 5s, any upgrades to the exhaust... aka going to 2.5" back etc is.... useless? - or at least not required i would think -------------------- ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: May 24th, 2025 - 6:14 AM |