Aug 27, 2012 - 8:22 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Dec 16, '10 From grand prairie, tx Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I had an 86 GTS with the 3SGE engine and my son has a 96 Vert with the 5SFE. I want to say that the older one had 135 HP as does the newer one. Can anyone give me an informed description about whether the technology of the late engine is better? If you were going to replace the motor which one would you choose?
|
![]() |
Aug 27, 2012 - 8:54 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 8, '03 From Lancaster CA Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) |
both of you guys are dead wrong.
The 5S-FE is a much better engine that the 3S-FE. it is newer technology, has a longer stroke making more torque and it is very boost friendly. the 3S-FE may have high compression but i doubt it higher than a 2ZZ and we boost those all day long. its all in the tuning. -------------------- 2001 Celica GT-S Turbo
1997 Supra TT 6speed 1997 Celica 3MZ/1MZ swap 1990 Celica All-Trac |
jackkasper 3SGE vs 5SFE Aug 27, 2012 - 8:22 AM
zfjohnson07 3sge is way way better than the 5sfe! the 3sge... Aug 27, 2012 - 8:44 AM
czwalga QUOTE (zfjohnson07 @ Aug 27, 2012 - 9... Aug 27, 2012 - 8:46 AM
czwalga QUOTE (Smaay @ Aug 27, 2012 - 9:54 A... Aug 27, 2012 - 9:44 AM
Xander_X People are getting confused here ... I'm seein... Aug 27, 2012 - 10:10 AM
czwalga QUOTE (Xander_X @ Aug 27, 2012 - 11... Aug 27, 2012 - 10:14 AM
richee3 To answer the OP's question directly, the 3S-G... Aug 27, 2012 - 10:30 AM
BonzaiCelica smaay you do know were comparing the 3sfe found in... Aug 30, 2012 - 7:00 PM
trdproven QUOTE (zfjohnson07 @ Aug 27, 2012 - 11... Aug 30, 2012 - 7:19 PM
delusionz Both are f*ckin sh*t.
Any chance of getting a new... Aug 31, 2012 - 12:40 AM
Smaay QUOTE (delusionz @ Aug 30, 2012 - 10... Aug 31, 2012 - 2:13 AM
Box ^What about now when I say to just get a 1MZ-FE? Aug 31, 2012 - 3:27 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: October 27th, 2025 - 4:53 PM |