Jul 17, 2006 - 12:17 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 25, '06 From Hong Kong Currently Offline Reputation: 256 (100%) |
![]() The text of the pics attached is in chinese. I am now try my best to translate a bit. Four brand of Fuel Pump for test .i.e.: 1. Brand start from "S" should be SARD 265L/H- Japanese Brand 2. Brand start from "P" 250L/H, don't know what the brand of this and where from 3. Walbro 255L/H 4. Stocked Honda 2000cc Equipment used for the test 1. Plastic Bucket(the net weight for this is 1lb) 2. Test Fluid in Green Color 3. A Counter 4. Car Battery with some wire 5. Fuel Bump itself The duration for this test is 1 minute, and the result is (the net weight for the empty bucket had been deducted): 1. Brand start from SARD 265L/H ---> 9 lbs 4 oz /min 2. Brand start from "P" 250L/H ---> 9 lbs 8 oz /min 3. Walbro 255L/H ---> 10 lbs 8 oz /min 4. Stocked Honda 2000cc ---> 5 lbs 12 oz /min The result may vary, as the shop provide this test seems wanna bump the sales of Walbro, but anyway that's still a nice test though. This post has been edited by vincent_doggy: Jul 17, 2006 - 12:56 AM -------------------- |
vincent_doggy Fuel Pump Comparison - 4 Brands test by a HK Car Magazine Jul 17, 2006 - 12:17 AM
Magic Vincent,i vote what i bought hahaha
Great Test ... Jul 17, 2006 - 7:52 AM
vincent_doggy QUOTE(Magic @ Jul 17, 2006 - 8:52 PM... Jul 17, 2006 - 8:03 AM
Aaagogo ebay
QUOTE(vincent_doggy @ Jul 17, 2006 ... Jul 17, 2006 - 10:14 PM
presure2 RE: Fuel Pump Comparison - 4 Brands test by a HK Car Magazine Jul 17, 2006 - 8:09 AM
WannabeGT4 Pumping fuel into a bucket is not the proper way t... Jul 17, 2006 - 11:22 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 10th, 2026 - 7:29 PM |