![]() ![]() |
Feb 14, 2003 - 7:16 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 3, '02 From bonzaisushi@hotmail.com Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
|
Feb 15, 2003 - 3:05 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 4, '02 From Davenport Iowa Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
lmao.... I knew there was a reason I didnt buy that torass!!!
will say the HSO is kinda badass though -------------------- ![]() 99 project version 3.0.. hello SEMA 2010 =) |
Feb 15, 2003 - 4:41 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Sep 9, '02 From houston Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
SHO...
|
Feb 15, 2003 - 2:12 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 1, '02 From PA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
my mom used to have a taurus sho...that thing kicked ass
|
Feb 15, 2003 - 9:58 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 30, '02 From NoVa Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
i heard the taurus SHOs were torquy as hell
|
Feb 16, 2003 - 2:29 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 11, '03 From Phila, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Yea the earlier Taurus SHOs we damn quick, they had a 3.2L 220 horsepower Yamaha race engine. The ones with 5spds were the best but when the Taurus's went to the new body style they changed engines and even though they were putting out 15 more hp and displaced .2L more they were slower than the older models because they were heavier V-8s.
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: December 6th, 2025 - 11:30 PM |