Jan 21, 2005 - 12:43 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
Ok, if I go NA (which nobody ever does with the 7a, so it would be unique) I would run a bout a 10:1ish compression ratio, have a 4ag small port head ported and properly worked. Run some really nice cams and ITB's. All of this would net me less than 150 whp, and probably more along the lines of 125ish. the bottom end would also be re-built with proper pistons and rods capable of about 7500 RPMs
IF Turbo, I would keep the 7afe engine set up. Differences would include nice pistons and rods with ARP studs all over the place. The head would also have a nice port job done, and the intake manifold would also get some serious work done. For all that would be installed I would keep the 9.5:1 to keep regular driveability. I would use a T3 and boost about 9lbs.. maybe 10 considering the mods (possibly up to 12 depending on my opinions once the engine is broken down) This would make about 180-190 whp Price would be VERY simmilar.. almost identical. Tell me what you would do. Different is cool, but all that power is nice. Jon This post has been edited by FallenHero: Jan 21, 2005 - 12:46 AM |
FallenHero need the consortium Jan 21, 2005 - 12:43 AM
playr158 for what you are doing..... you should go turbo fo... Jan 21, 2005 - 12:48 AM
Kwanza26 I know everyone's gonna say turbo... cause tha... Jan 21, 2005 - 1:57 AM
Hanyo i would go n/a... turbos have too much maintainenc... Jan 21, 2005 - 5:34 AM
SinisterWhisper Well I wish you would go with a supercharger it mi... Jan 21, 2005 - 6:30 AM
nik i'm working on a group buy for pistons and rod... Jan 21, 2005 - 10:58 AM
FallenHero QUOTE(nik @ Jan 21, 2005 - 8:58 AM)i'm wo... Jan 21, 2005 - 11:35 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 4th, 2026 - 10:57 AM |