 more reliable : GT or ST ?, probably been coverd before... |
 Mar 5, 2005 - 12:15 AM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Mar 8, '04 From Newport, RI Currently Offline Reputation: 63 (99%)  |
maybe it's just me but I think I have seen more posts about GT having more probs than STs. Am I just imagining it ?
I know they are both some of the most reliable engines ever, but, which is more reliable long term ? My opinion is that GT owners have most likely driven their cars harder (more wear and tear) than ST owners. If your car has the power you are more likely to use it more often. People with a 7a probably aren't going to push it because, well, they aren't going to get the results they want and probably accept it. I think you are more likely to find a more abused GT than an ST. If you find a babied GT or a babied ST, which would last longer ? what do you all think ? -------------------- |
Posts in this topic
Batman722 more reliable : GT or ST ? Mar 5, 2005 - 12:15 AM
Supersprynt I think both engines are equally reliable. Mar 5, 2005 - 12:20 AM
CheesyLobster QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Mar 5, 2005 - 5:20 AM)I t... Mar 5, 2005 - 1:15 AM Supersprynt I have a GT but not a GT engiine Mar 5, 2005 - 1:40 AM Kwanza26 The 7AFE powerplant and drivetrain is far more rel... Mar 5, 2005 - 3:00 AM Insanity-74 Both engines are pretty bomb proof, typical japane... Mar 5, 2005 - 3:17 AM 94GT My 5SFE (GT) has almost 250,000 miles on it, and i... Mar 5, 2005 - 8:25 PM pr_caralho QUOTE(94GT @ Mar 5, 2005 - 8:25 PM)My 5SFE (G... Mar 5, 2005 - 10:49 PM 2003cbgts celicas are damn tanks Mar 5, 2005 - 11:47 PM macavely well just got back from a 700 mile road trip... an... Mar 6, 2005 - 4:44 AM Digndoug I think there all the same.. But it all depends on... Mar 6, 2005 - 12:04 PM pokemeintheeye I'm gonna have to agree with Insanity-74. Mos... Mar 6, 2005 - 6:05 PM  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: June 2nd, 2025 - 3:37 PM |