6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 3sgte in an ST vs RSX Type - S Stock
post Apr 28, 2005 - 2:05 PM
+Quote Post
SoundSlut_dotcom



Enthusiast
****
Joined Feb 16, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




my girl has the RSX.. hook up a turbo to that motor and a 3s wont come close.. unless that 3s is modded really heavily. top to bottom.. RSX engine is DEF a better engine to mod. in my choice. but as far as the original question... Run your new 3sgte a few times tune it. and see what kind of numbers your puttin up... IMO

bye.


--------------------
post Apr 28, 2005 - 2:19 PM
+Quote Post
Ryu3x16



Enthusiast
***
Joined Jan 1, '03
From LB gizzie, cali
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(XXX_Mina @ Apr 28, 2005 - 2:01 AM)
first car i beat when i got my swap was turpoed h22 prelude...
as for the RSX type s vs 3s celica with uped boost, ill go with the celica... stock for stock, rsx type s might win since 3s is only 225hp and the rsx is a little lighter and has v-tech... 3s is a heavey bitch..

Mina
[right][snapback]279363[/snapback][/right]


you beat a turbo h22?!? crazy...
as for a rsx vs 3s stock for stock, I had no problem beating em. My friend's friend has a 2004. so...speaking from experience 3s would win. raced it off the line and raced it on a roll.. took it both and this is before my fmic

This post has been edited by Ryu3x16: Apr 28, 2005 - 2:26 PM


--------------------
[color=#FF0000] I MISS MY RED BABY =(
post Apr 28, 2005 - 2:57 PM
+Quote Post
Mr2_Joel



Enthusiast
*
Joined Apr 17, '05
From Westminster, MD
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(SoundSlut_dotcom @ Apr 28, 2005 - 3:05 PM)
my girl has the RSX.. hook up a turbo to that motor and a 3s wont come close.. unless that 3s is modded really heavily. top to bottom.. RSX engine is DEF a better engine to mod. in my choice. but as far as the original question... Run your new 3sgte a few times tune it. and see what kind of numbers your puttin up...  IMO

bye.
[right][snapback]279568[/snapback][/right]


a better engine in what sense? You take the money needed to buy a turbo kit for the rsx, i'll take the money and buy a bigger turbo and other stuff. Same amount of money in........bubye rsx tongue.gif


--------------------
White 93 Mr2 Turbo
intake, exhaust, and stuff
post Apr 28, 2005 - 3:12 PM
+Quote Post
darksecret



Enthusiast
****
Joined Mar 9, '05
From Charlotte
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Well seeing that the KA20 is a new engine good luck finding them as cheap as the 3SGTE, and I haven't actually seen an 800hp KA20, i'm not saying there isn't one, I just haven't seen it.
post Apr 28, 2005 - 5:00 PM
+Quote Post
SoundSlut_dotcom



Enthusiast
****
Joined Feb 16, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




QUOTE(Mr2_Joel @ Apr 28, 2005 - 12:57 PM)
QUOTE(SoundSlut_dotcom @ Apr 28, 2005 - 3:05 PM)
my girl has the RSX.. hook up a turbo to that motor and a 3s wont come close.. unless that 3s is modded really heavily. top to bottom.. RSX engine is DEF a better engine to mod. in my choice. but as far as the original question... Run your new 3sgte a few times tune it. and see what kind of numbers your puttin up...  IMO

bye.
[right][snapback]279568[/snapback][/right]


a better engine in what sense? You take the money needed to buy a turbo kit for the rsx, i'll take the money and buy a bigger turbo and other stuff. Same amount of money in........bubye rsx tongue.gif
[right][snapback]279601[/snapback][/right]

it all depends whats been done to the engine .. some engines u cant compare.. but these 2 you can. . .
ex: i seen a turbo civic beat a turbo rsx.. ??? which leads me to believe that a 6gc st or gt turbo can even beat a rsx... so its hard to say till u run em. thats y people bet lol


--------------------
post Apr 28, 2005 - 5:34 PM
+Quote Post
lagos



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 31, '02
From Philadelphia, PA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




i dont fear the rsx...esp not this one
http://s17.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3NQXNYQ...LO2FYC2EXK34Q7K


--------------------
15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
post Apr 28, 2005 - 6:01 PM
+Quote Post
vangSTa_celica

Enthusiast
****
Joined Jul 10, '03
From Appleton,WI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




What a loser. Haha.


--------------------
user posted image
A Jaws4God Creation...
post Apr 28, 2005 - 6:25 PM
+Quote Post
celicaboston1983

Enthusiast
***
Joined Mar 20, '04
Currently Offline

Reputation: 3 (100%)




what happened to the car
post Apr 28, 2005 - 7:09 PM
+Quote Post
XXX_Mina



Enthusiast
**
Joined Jan 8, '03
From Miami, FL
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




add a turbo to an rsx and i can still beat ... ive destroyed one of the cybernation's turbo rsx type S on the highway... it was a short race thou... i was a car ahead of him and gaining until my shifter mest up... because of vibrations, some pin flew off and i could'nt shift into 4th gear ... but i ****ed him up in 2nd and 3rd... i was doing about 13-15 psi on 93 octaine with octaine booster... The good thing about turbo engines, is that you can always turn up the boost... if the rsx does beat you... just get some octaine booster and turn up your boost... also if you use a stock ECU, try to get the boost cut defender asap. and dont shift into 2nd until the wheels stop spinning...

Mina

This post has been edited by XXX_Mina: Apr 28, 2005 - 7:23 PM
post Apr 29, 2005 - 1:48 AM
+Quote Post
97sccelica



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 30, '02
From Anaheim, CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(Ryu3x16 @ Apr 28, 2005 - 11:19 AM)
QUOTE(XXX_Mina @ Apr 28, 2005 - 2:01 AM)
first car i beat when i got my swap was turpoed h22 prelude...
as for the RSX type s vs 3s celica with uped boost, ill go with the celica... stock for stock, rsx type s might win since 3s is only 225hp and the rsx is a little lighter and has v-tech... 3s is a heavey bitch..

Mina
[right][snapback]279363[/snapback][/right]


you beat a turbo h22?!? crazy...
as for a rsx vs 3s stock for stock, I had no problem beating em. My friend's friend has a 2004. so...speaking from experience 3s would win. raced it off the line and raced it on a roll.. took it both and this is before my fmic
[right][snapback]279573[/snapback][/right]


preludes are heavy. i have driven a turbo h22 prelude. it was fun, and faster than most cars on the road, but it wasnt by any means fast


--------------------
1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram
post Apr 29, 2005 - 2:14 AM
+Quote Post
saleeka



Enthusiast
****
Joined Sep 4, '03
From Twin Cities MN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




that 800 hp 3SGTE isnt in a FWD car, however, so that really isnt a logical comparison...


--------------------
Car #3: 98 Accord LX- purchased 5/06, totaled 8/06
Car #2: 95 Celica GT- purchased 8/03, current daily driver
Car #1: 01 Focus ZX3- purchased 5/01, sold 8/03
post Apr 29, 2005 - 6:38 AM
+Quote Post
XXX_Mina



Enthusiast
**
Joined Jan 8, '03
From Miami, FL
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(saleeka @ Apr 29, 2005 - 12:14 AM)
that 800 hp 3SGTE isnt in a FWD car, however, so that really isnt a logical comparison...
[right][snapback]279895[/snapback][/right]


doesnt matter if its not in a FWD car.. one motor is just way more capable than the other...

also: there is one in a fwd 7th gen celica pushing 640hp+

Mina

This post has been edited by XXX_Mina: Apr 29, 2005 - 12:25 PM

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: July 28th, 2025 - 11:36 AM