Where can I find info about...., honda s2k's Options

[gt_driFFter]

Well to make a long story short, I have been obsessing over s2k's for quite a while now and I am actually contemplating selling the celi and getting one. One reason being that it has 235k miles on it. Anyways, I was just wondering if anyone knew of any sites with good info on s2ks, or if anyone could answer any of these questions.

-What's a good year to get? (yes I realize that's an extremely general question but I don't know how else to word it)
-What year did they start making them?
-What would be considered a good price on a used, but still good condition s2k

Thanks,
-Josh

This post has been edited by gt_driFFter: May 8, 2005 - 10:13 PM

[Coomer]

Go to Honda-Tech. There's so much information there.

http://www.honda-tech.com

[95gtschick]

umm get a.. what year was it. 2001. more horsepower, better looks, nicer interior. (my friend works at a honda dealership and is in love with s2k's) if you wanna talk to him email him at dave_fehr@hotmail.com

[Digndoug]

The 00-03 I hear are the best. Well faster.. I cant remember to many reasons. But Im thinking about getting one too.. there so sexy and reliable.

[hioctane]

deleted

This post has been edited by hioctane: Jul 31, 2005 - 12:45 PM

[turboinduction]

2000-2003 had a 2.0. 240HP 153TQ
2004-2005 got a 2.2. Same HP but 162TQ.

All years are rougly the same. And to my knowledge, the S2K is the most powerful N/A 4-Cyl to be used in a production car. If anyone out there knows of a better, please post.

2000-2003 S2000 Info

2004 S2000 Info

2005 S2000 Info

-Ti

[Digndoug]

i heard the s2k is underpowered with barely any torque but enough to fulfill your needs.
[right][snapback]284528[/snapback][/right]

If you think a 14 1/4 mile stock is underpowerd in a vert.. then yes under powered..

How much trq do you need for a 2 seater vert that is only 2800 lbs??

[darksecret]

A 14 quarter is all the S2000 can do, man am I out of the loop. Yes that's way underpowered, the Mazdaspeed Miata is missing 60 horses and still does the 0-60 and quarter mile 1 second slower, but cost $4,000 less and has a turbo, so a few hundred on a boost controller and boom you're running with an S2000, or take that extra $4,000 and mod the Miata and you'll be tearing S2000's a new one. Of course good luck finding a used Mazdaspeed Miata for cheap.

[blu94gt]

A 14 quarter is all the S2000 can do, man am I out of the loop. Yes that's way underpowered, the Mazdaspeed Miata is missing 60 horses and still does the 0-60 and quarter mile 1 second slower, but cost $4,000 less and has a turbo, so a few hundred on a boost controller and boom you're running with an S2000, or take that extra $4,000 and mod the Miata and you'll be tearing S2000's a new one. Of course good luck finding a used Mazdaspeed Miata for cheap.
[right][snapback]284685[/snapback][/right]

The S2000 wasn't built to be a drag car, it was built for the road course. It doesn't have much torque and all it's power is in the higher RPMS (the redline is what, 9500?) I like them but I don't know if I would want one on the street

[darksecret]

Actually the RPM's are around 8700, but were talking about usable power here, of course if you want to hit 3,000 rpm's before you find any real power, not to mention the Miata's only handling flaw is the body roll, it's got a cushy ride and still pulls higher g's on a skid pad. IMO comparing the Mazdaspeed to the S2000 is like the MR2 to an NSX, the NSX is a little better, but only a little, and the price makes up for it.

This post has been edited by darksecret: May 9, 2005 - 3:23 PM

[Digndoug]

A 14 quarter is all the S2000 can do, man am I out of the loop. Yes that's way underpowered, the Mazdaspeed Miata is missing 60 horses and still does the 0-60 and quarter mile 1 second slower, but cost $4,000 less and has a turbo, so a few hundred on a boost controller and boom you're running with an S2000, or take that extra $4,000 and mod the Miata and you'll be tearing S2000's a new one. Of course good luck finding a used Mazdaspeed Miata for cheap.
[right][snapback]284685[/snapback][/right]

Your kidding right. The thing about the mazda speed.. A: Mazda are not reliable engines. B: Its turboed and is STILL Slower. C: you spend 4k to make up the comparison, but its already stressed out. Put a lil bit more money into the s2k it will spank it. Im not a honda lover, but the s2k is an awsome car.

[darksecret]

I was wrong, it's about a $7,000 difference. This is from Car and Driver when they did a comparison against the Elise and the S2000 only beat the Miata by 3.5 seconds at BeaveRun. So $7,000 in mods and you have a car that isn't far from smoking an NSX. Do you actually think they take a stock Miata engine and slap a turbo on it, of course not, they don't take a 3SGE and slap a turbo on it, without replacing the internals. Factory turbo cars tend to have stronger parts simply because if the stock parts fail, the manufacturer is liable. If you like the Miata then it's one of the best bang for the buck roadsters, besides I think the Mazdaspeed Protege is crap (i'll take a Sentra SE-R) so it's not that i'm all about Mazda either.

This post has been edited by darksecret: May 9, 2005 - 7:25 PM

[Digndoug]

I was wrong, it's about a $7,000 difference. This is from Car and Driver when they did a comparison against the Elise and the S2000 only beat the Miata by 3.5 seconds at BeaveRun. So $7,000 in mods and you have a car that isn't far  from smoking an NSX. Do you actually think they take a stock Miata engine and slap a turbo on it, of course not, they don't take a 3SGE and slap a turbo on it, without replacing the internals. Factory turbo cars tend to have stronger parts simply because if the stock parts fail, the manufacturer is liable. If you like the Miata then it's one of the best bang for the buck roadsters, besides I think the Mazdaspeed Protege is crap (i'll take a Sentra SE-R) so it's not that i'm all about Mazda either.
[right][snapback]284832[/snapback][/right]

I understand what you mean. and the mx5 is an awsome lil car too. BUT the s2k is by far better stock. and for some people its much easier to buy a car that is better stock and has a better base, so they can do simple mods.

To be honist, i n\said i would never buy a honda, but im thinking hard about buying an s2k soon.

[turboinduction]

dougy dougy... no no no - watch that quick finger of yours

1. Mazdas are FAR reliable vehicles, where do you get this non-sense. Working for Mazda/Nissan/Honda, I will shed my insight.

2. the Miata is the best handling roadster I've ever driven bar none. The S2k is fantastic, but for 33,000 dollars, I'd take a MS Miata anyday.

3. You said the MS Miata is already stressed out? The S2k is a 2.0 (edit: or 2.2) at EXTREMELY high compression - that engine is maxed out. The miata is running low boost to put the car into the badass catagory with the Elise and whatnot.

4. The S2k is the best built car ever, according to the testers. Of any car they've ever driven, the S2k is the best built vehicle. Even moreso the the NSX, which surprised me.

5. Dark secret - I like the MS Protege... but then again, look at my aviator and you'll see which of the two cars I bought. Give ya a hint, mine's got a 6-spd.

6. Dollar for Dollar - the MS Miata wins. Value - S2k wins. Build ability, they tie. Both are hit big. The Miata is already turbo, and the S2k is maxed as far as a N/A can get. Take your pic.

7. For my pick, I'd take the Flying M.

-Ti

This post has been edited by turboinduction: May 9, 2005 - 9:47 PM

[Digndoug]

I ment the mx5 is sterssed out by already having a turbop, put a turbo.. better yet the supercharger made for the 2sk on, It will have much more power and will be much faster.

I have a buddy thats into mazdas hard core because the cost.. but still says there not nearly reliable as hondas.

Also he has done 10 engine swaps and re-build 5 motors.. all mazda.

[bloodrain]

i like the looks of the s2k over the miata. So i'd take the s2k, and u gotta love the vtech when it kicks in

[Mr2_Joel]

miata's are girl cars.......

s2k > miata

[Kwanza26]

Heheh... some uninformed opinions here...

Ahem... the Miata is a great car. The Mazdaspeed version is great also... but it's not in the same class as the S2000. The S2000 runs with 350Z's and Audi TT's and such... somewhere the Miata doesn't really venture (stock for stock at least). Let's take a loot at specs:

Mazadaspeed Miata:
178hp @ 6000 rpms
166ftlbs of torque @ 4500 rpms
curb weight: ~2500 pounds
0-60 (Car&Driver tested): 6.7
1/4 mile: 15.1 @ 91mph

Honda S2000 (03+ spec):
240hp @ 7800 rpms
162 ftlbs of torque @ 6500 rpms
curb weight: ~2800
0-60 (Car&Driver tested): 5.4
1/4 mile: 14.1 @ 97mph

Both cars are built to handle the corners. The miata has a slight weight advantage, but the S2000 has the power advantage. Oh yeah, don't even get into power vs. torque unless you know what you're talking about, otherwise I'll be forced to pWN you... First off, the Miata is running an aftermarket type turbokit on an originally n/a engine. The compression is still 9:5:1, it runs only 7 psi, and is pretty much as it is. There are only minor modifications you can do to the engine until you start pushing its limits. The S2000 on the other hand has one of the most beastly n/a 4 banger ever to be mass-produced... but this engine is nearly fully tuned from the factory and only very minor gains can be squeezed with bolt-ons. Both are about equal from a tuner standpoint, both having strong aftermarket support. I'd give it to the S2000 based on engines alone. I love the way Miatas drive (tempted to pick one up myself), but the S2000 is in a whole 'nother catergory.

And darksecret: 3.5 seconds at Beaver run is a LOT of difference. Take 3.5 seconds and extend that into more laps, then the difference starts to grow.

[darksecret]

I wasn't the one that classified the Miata into that catagory, Car and Driver did that one, they are both roadsters and were not comparing the Miata to an M Roadster here, there's only a second difference between the two and the only reason the Miata didn't own the S2000 at beave was because it has a cushy ride, it wasn't made to be a track car, and it can easily run with one. It's just sad that all the engineering that Honda put into the S2000 and it doesn't take much for a basically stock Miata to smoke it. If the Miata handled a little better then I would leave it to the drivers.

Also for turboinduction ? I thought the SE-R was Nissan man, or is it the whole performance sedan thing.

[juBz86]

look at those eyes. how you say no?