6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Geos, Toyota converting Chevy owners
post Dec 19, 2005 - 9:56 PM
+Quote Post
Kwanza26



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 27, '03
From Nor Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(Bigmeanbulldog55 @ Dec 20, 2005 - 2:32 AM) [snapback]369127[/snapback]

Wow, I think your wrong. I never thought I'd correct you. The 90-93 Impulses came with 1.8 turbo RS with AWD, and the non turbo 1.8 litter. The turbo was rated at 155 hp, the non was 135. The 90-93 Geo Storm came with the 1.8 non turbo motor, and the 1.6 non turbo. So it was a small turbo. My non turbo was just fine for speed. And the transmision on it was great. Shifted a lot smoother than the Celica and felt like it would take a lot of abuse. Just minor things, but I wouldn't pass up the oppertunity to correct you.

I'm right... ;]
user posted image


--------------------
"It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"

1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver...

1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies...

1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be...
post Dec 19, 2005 - 11:34 PM
+Quote Post
Dr_Tweak



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 31, '04
From Summerville, SC
Currently Offline

Reputation: 5 (100%)




Ouch, OWNAGE by Kwanza...


--------------------
-Dr Tweak, 6GC's resident engine swap wiring expert extraordinaire
Click here to see my swaps
drtweak@phoenixtuning.com

post Dec 20, 2005 - 10:15 PM
+Quote Post
Bigmeanbulldog55



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 1, '03
From WV
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




Why is it like that? I swear the engines look exactly the same from the top. I thought there was no way it was the 1.6 turboed. I've even heard of guys mounting the turbo manifold on the non turbo 1.8 to turbo them. Why is that? What's going on with this. Did they use the same head and a smaller block? I never would have guessed it was a 1.6 turbo. I've had it in my head that that was the 1.8 turboed for so long that I'm having trouble believing this.

EDIT: I looked up the years too. I assumed since the Storm was made untill 93 that it's conterpart the Impulse would have been made untill the same year. That's the bad thing about assuming.

This post has been edited by Bigmeanbulldog55: Dec 20, 2005 - 10:19 PM


--------------------
Live Free, Be Happy
IPB Image
post Dec 22, 2005 - 1:35 AM
+Quote Post
soulshadow



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 18, '05
From Lincoln, Ar
Currently Offline

Reputation: 7 (100%)




I always thought those cars were crap cause they looked like crap and smelled like it too. I never even thought that they had a Toyota engine in em. They look so silly and horrible misconfigured.
post Dec 27, 2005 - 3:44 AM
+Quote Post
Celicav



Enthusiast
****
Joined Aug 31, '02
From Virginia
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




You guys know way too much on specs for cars that most of us would care less if they ever existed lol wink.gif But at the same time, I admire you for your superior mechanical knowledge (versus me)

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: October 26th, 2025 - 5:34 PM