![]() ![]() |
Jan 19, 2007 - 8:20 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 9, '05 From Long Beach Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
QUOTE(x_itchy_b_x @ Jan 19, 2007 - 1:57 PM) [snapback]519336[/snapback] QUOTE(markie @ Jan 19, 2007 - 6:40 PM) [snapback]519334[/snapback] sigh.. what can a stock 5sfe keep up with? a geo metro all i had on my 5sfe was an intake an it was DEAD even with a mustang 6 cylinder with an intake also. was the mustang automatic? just curious. -------------------- Is this good enuff 4 ya? :D
![]() |
Jan 20, 2007 - 2:00 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 7, '06 From Houston, Tx Currently Offline Reputation: 17 (100%) |
QUOTE(lagos @ Jan 19, 2007 - 4:35 PM) [snapback]519332[/snapback] EDIT: something funny came to mind. the owners of the local dyno around here had a really high hp del sol. the car was a beast and i think it did around 500hp? i was talking to the guy and he said that when they took it to the track, it only ran a mid 13. .... so that just goes to show that its not the hp, but the fwd platform that limits you in getting good 1/4 times. so would converting the Celica to the AWD platform make it perform better in the 1/4? has anyone been able to test this? -------------------- -Alex {](O_o)[}
1993.5 Toyota Supra ....with stuff.... ....sorta broken.... 1998 Toyota Celica ....this one, too, has stuff.... ....broken....yeah...definitely broken.... |
Jan 20, 2007 - 3:38 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 17, '06 From under your bed. Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
QUOTE(NgoFcukinWay @ Jan 20, 2007 - 2:00 AM) [snapback]519439[/snapback] QUOTE(lagos @ Jan 19, 2007 - 4:35 PM) [snapback]519332[/snapback] EDIT: something funny came to mind. the owners of the local dyno around here had a really high hp del sol. the car was a beast and i think it did around 500hp? i was talking to the guy and he said that when they took it to the track, it only ran a mid 13. .... so that just goes to show that its not the hp, but the fwd platform that limits you in getting good 1/4 times. so would converting the Celica to the AWD platform make it perform better in the 1/4? has anyone been able to test this? As a matter of fact, you will have better traction with AWD. FWD pulls the weight of the car where as RWD would push. (Duh?) But as for AWD does both. So overall yes, it helps big time. I think alot of you guys who own the Celica GT (5SFE) and the MR2 NonTurbo (5S-FE) can tell the difference even though the MR2 weights more than the Celica. This post has been edited by ExSane: Jan 20, 2007 - 3:39 AM -------------------- ![]() |
Jan 20, 2007 - 9:51 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 16, '03 From Bay area Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(NgoFcukinWay @ Jan 19, 2007 - 11:00 PM) [snapback]519439[/snapback] so would converting the Celica to the AWD platform make it perform better in the 1/4? has anyone been able to test this? why would we need to do the conversion? Why would we need to test it out? we have REAL gt4 with awd transmission that come with st205 3sgte motors in them stock. They can easily run 14 second quarter miles. The main thing that slow down front wheel drive cars on the quarter mile is weight. |
Jan 20, 2007 - 6:44 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 22, '06 From Savannah, GA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
So how about a 2nd gen with FMIC, forged pistons, balanced crank, port and polished, rods, valves, springs, cams, and a greddy turbo also the norm 3" DP and exhaust and a new manifold and bored out to a 2.2. what do yoiu guys think thatll be runin at for hp and wut you think thats gonna hang with. guesses on 1/4 times. i got my speculations but wanna see what you guys think. ohh and light weight flywheel and stage 2 clutch mabye stage 3
|
Jan 20, 2007 - 6:53 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 16, '03 From Bay area Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(6G94celica @ Jan 20, 2007 - 3:44 PM) [snapback]519552[/snapback] So how about a 2nd gen with FMIC, forged pistons, balanced crank, port and polished, rods, valves, springs, cams, and a greddy turbo also the norm 3" DP and exhaust and a new manifold and bored out to a 2.2. what do yoiu guys think thatll be runin at for hp and wut you think thats gonna hang with. guesses on 1/4 times. i got my speculations but wanna see what you guys think. ohh and light weight flywheel and stage 2 clutch mabye stage 3 what turbo are you using? what tires do you have? Suspension? Sea level? Humidity? Transmission? There are a ton of variables to consider to determine quarter mile times. Little things such as transmission gearing can break or make your set up. |
Jan 20, 2007 - 7:07 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) |
QUOTE(6G94celica @ Jan 20, 2007 - 6:44 PM) [snapback]519552[/snapback] So how about a 2nd gen with FMIC, forged pistons, balanced crank, port and polished, rods, valves, springs, cams, and a greddy turbo also the norm 3" DP and exhaust and a new manifold and bored out to a 2.2. what do yoiu guys think thatll be runin at for hp and wut you think thats gonna hang with. guesses on 1/4 times. i got my speculations but wanna see what you guys think. ohh and light weight flywheel and stage 2 clutch mabye stage 3 ok lets slow down inorder to get 2.2L you must STROKE the 3sgte and use a 5sfe crank, machined to accept 3sgte rods. (a stroker kit for the 3sgte ~$2,000) greddy turbo crapo, go garrett. but what size your getting yourself into a WHOLE world of variables and you CANNOT speculate on the kind of performance and times it can do...and lol at the idea of using a stage 2 clutch on that kind of motor you can run with who ever it just depends HOW much money you have, HOW much time you have and WHAT kind of goals you have before this thread continues, please stop and think logically... what do i want in a car, how much money do i have, and what is the BEST and most FEASABLE way to achieve that goal.... now this thread should die |
Jan 20, 2007 - 7:19 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 22, '06 From Savannah, GA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
well the gt tranny wouldnt hold up to taht kind of motor would it so the mr2 turbo tranny unless gt will hold up
|
Jan 21, 2007 - 3:18 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jun 19, '05 From Nebraska Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
^ Punctuation?? ^ GT tranny will hold. The S54 has out performed what most all us thought it could actually take.
-------------------- Teh Celica sleeps for Winter '06. Suspension overhaul begins........
|
Jan 21, 2007 - 3:20 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 1, '05 From Charlotte NC Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
QUOTE(playr158 @ Jan 20, 2007 - 7:07 PM) [snapback]519557[/snapback] QUOTE(6G94celica @ Jan 20, 2007 - 6:44 PM) [snapback]519552[/snapback] So how about a 2nd gen with FMIC, forged pistons, balanced crank, port and polished, rods, valves, springs, cams, and a greddy turbo also the norm 3" DP and exhaust and a new manifold and bored out to a 2.2. what do yoiu guys think thatll be runin at for hp and wut you think thats gonna hang with. guesses on 1/4 times. i got my speculations but wanna see what you guys think. ohh and light weight flywheel and stage 2 clutch mabye stage 3 your getting yourself into a WHOLE world of variables and you CANNOT speculate on the kind of performance and times it can do...and lol at the idea of using a stage 2 clutch on that kind of motor Take his word for it....i found out THE HARD WAY that a stage 2 wont hold up..... This post has been edited by easternpiro1: Jan 21, 2007 - 4:45 AM -------------------- |
Jan 21, 2007 - 3:22 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) |
yes i'm laughing at you, rofl rofl
|
Jan 21, 2007 - 3:26 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
QUOTE(easternpiro1 @ Jan 21, 2007 - 3:20 AM) [snapback]519656[/snapback] QUOTE(playr158 @ Jan 20, 2007 - 7:07 PM) [snapback]519557[/snapback] QUOTE(6G94celica @ Jan 20, 2007 - 6:44 PM) [snapback]519552[/snapback] So how about a 2nd gen with FMIC, forged pistons, balanced crank, port and polished, rods, valves, springs, cams, and a greddy turbo also the norm 3" DP and exhaust and a new manifold and bored out to a 2.2. what do yoiu guys think thatll be runin at for hp and wut you think thats gonna hang with. guesses on 1/4 times. i got my speculations but wanna see what you guys think. ohh and light weight flywheel and stage 2 clutch mabye stage 3 your getting yourself into a WHOLE world of variables and you CANNOT speculate on the kind of performance and times it can do...and lol at the idea of using a stage 2 clutch on that kind of motor Take his word for it....i found out THE HARD WAY that a stage 2 wont hold up..... a stage2 should hold the power just fine. yours probably died early from either an incorrect install, or the fact that you probably didnt take the time to break it in correctly. -------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
Jan 21, 2007 - 4:09 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 1, '05 From Charlotte NC Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
that may also be VERY true
but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers... -------------------- |
Jan 21, 2007 - 6:47 AM
|
|
|
Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
QUOTE(easternpiro1 @ Jan 21, 2007 - 4:09 AM) [snapback]519665[/snapback] that may also be VERY true but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers... i seriously doubt that. ive been running my ACT street disk and heavy duty PP (rated for 250 ft. lbs.) for a yr and a half, most of that time over the limit of the clutch, or right @ it, with no issues. IMO 99% of the premature clutch failures you see are from either bad install, or bad break in. -------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
![]() 13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
Jan 22, 2007 - 3:50 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 1, '05 From Charlotte NC Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
QUOTE(presure2 @ Jan 21, 2007 - 6:47 AM) [snapback]519677[/snapback] QUOTE(easternpiro1 @ Jan 21, 2007 - 4:09 AM) [snapback]519665[/snapback] that may also be VERY true but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers... i seriously doubt that. ive been running my ACT street disk and heavy duty PP (rated for 250 ft. lbs.) for a yr and a half, most of that time over the limit of the clutch, or right @ it, with no issues. IMO 99% of the premature clutch failures you see are from either bad install, or bad break in. youre probably right, probably didnt break the 2nd one in right. the guy suggested i go with a jdm clutch, starts with an x. forgot what he called it. -------------------- |
Jan 22, 2007 - 6:39 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) |
xact?
|
Jan 22, 2007 - 7:54 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 1, '05 From Charlotte NC Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
QUOTE(playr158 @ Jan 22, 2007 - 6:39 PM) [snapback]520196[/snapback] xact? yeah i think that was it -------------------- |
Jan 22, 2007 - 10:32 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 7, '06 From Houston, Tx Currently Offline Reputation: 17 (100%) |
or exedy?
-------------------- -Alex {](O_o)[}
1993.5 Toyota Supra ....with stuff.... ....sorta broken.... 1998 Toyota Celica ....this one, too, has stuff.... ....broken....yeah...definitely broken.... |
Jan 23, 2007 - 8:59 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) |
exedy = start with E
xact = start with X jus givin a hard time |
Jan 24, 2007 - 11:51 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 7, '06 From Houston, Tx Currently Offline Reputation: 17 (100%) |
QUOTE(playr158 @ Jan 23, 2007 - 8:59 AM) [snapback]520374[/snapback] exedy = start with E xact = start with X jus givin a hard time only if you spell it out. -------------------- -Alex {](O_o)[}
1993.5 Toyota Supra ....with stuff.... ....sorta broken.... 1998 Toyota Celica ....this one, too, has stuff.... ....broken....yeah...definitely broken.... |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 21st, 2025 - 11:04 PM |