![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Sep 24, '02 From North Carolina Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
Hmmm........this can possibly be my issue too!!! If only there was someone working on my car, I am so far away from it right now that I can't just go work on it myself =[
-------------------- |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined May 11, '06 From Wisconsin Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Now I am really confused. I did a trouble shoot to figure out why I was getting those codes and all of the sensors are good, the wiring checks out and the ecu should be good(unless I have two bad ecus, becaues they both pop the same codes).
I am out of ideas. Even with those codes the enigne should try to turn over wouldn't it? Is there anything else I should check to get ride of the codes? -------------------- ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 9, '06 From Ma Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
Check your E2 wire. It's brown.
It supplies the source voltage for all those sensors. I'm surprised you don't have a MAP sensor code too. QUOTE(x_itchy_b_x @ Mar 15, 2007 - 7:50 AM) [snapback]536495[/snapback] i have a 93 jdm 3s and its ecu only has one board and no silk screen pin lables. If you're going by the part# on the case, someone probably swapped a cover or case on you. There's a reason the 92^ have 2 circuit boards. There is a more sensitive second diagnostic mode on those ECUs. Which is the reason for the second board. It's not a some do some don't like the 7 vs 9 hole exhaust manifolds, ALL 92^ ECUs have them. So does the 5SFE for that matter. -------------------- ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 12, '02 From Webster Ma. Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(alltracman78 @ Mar 18, 2007 - 9:51 AM) [snapback]537285[/snapback] Check your E2 wire. It's brown. It supplies the source voltage for all those sensors. I'm surprised you don't have a MAP sensor code too. QUOTE(x_itchy_b_x @ Mar 15, 2007 - 7:50 AM) [snapback]536495[/snapback] i have a 93 jdm 3s and its ecu only has one board and no silk screen pin lables. If you're going by the part# on the case, someone probably swapped a cover or case on you. There's a reason the 92^ have 2 circuit boards. There is a more sensitive second diagnostic mode on those ECUs. Which is the reason for the second board. It's not a some do some don't like the 7 vs 9 hole exhaust manifolds, ALL 92^ ECUs have them. So does the 5SFE for that matter. im pretty sure it's a 93. i was basing that off of the fact that i have a 9 stud manifold and the plug wires. my ecu code is 89661-20750=89/10-90/03(superceded to 20751), and i bought the engine in a front clip I can assure you the ecu/cover wasn't swapped, the screws i removed from there had no signs of even having a screw driver in them. Wait, so if thats the case, did i buy a 91 that had a 93 head put on it.... -------------------- |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 9, '06 From Ma Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(x_itchy_b_x @ Mar 18, 2007 - 10:54 AM) [snapback]537303[/snapback] im pretty sure it's a 93. i was basing that off of the fact that i have a 9 stud manifold and the plug wires. my ecu code is 89661-20750=89/10-90/03(superceded to 20751), and i bought the engine in a front clip I can assure you the ecu/cover wasn't swapped, the screws i removed from there had no signs of even having a screw driver in them. Wait, so if thats the case, did i buy a 91 that had a 93 head put on it.... C'mon man. I'm really not trying to be a dick. I promise. ![]() But you just posted the production date of your ECU, and yet you're trying to tell me it's a 93? Did you not realize that was the production date? Plug wires/cap are no indication. They are easily changed. The 9 hole manifold is less likely to have been swapped. But since the 90/91 heads had all 9 stud holes, it isn't that hard to do. That or someone swapped ECUs in the clip. It's happened before. I don't know why in a regular ST185 [I could see an RC], but that ECU part # is from an EARLY ST185. From the first 5 months of production. -------------------- ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 12, '02 From Webster Ma. Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
no im agreeing with you lol. im saying damn i thought it was a 93 all along until now
![]() I took for face value that it was a 93 because thats what the importer said. I didn't even bother to justify it until this ecu code just showed me that it wasnt a 93. I appreciate you and your knowledge, trust me ![]() QUOTE Wait, so if thats the case, did i buy a 91 that had a 93 head put on it.... that wasn't ment to be sarcastic, that was me coming to terms with owning a 91 3sgte ![]() This post has been edited by x_itchy_b_x: Mar 18, 2007 - 2:55 PM -------------------- |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 9, '06 From Ma Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
Cool man.
![]() I think sometimes I end up coming across as a dick when I don't mean to. Just wanted you to know I wasn't trying to. -------------------- ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 21st, 2025 - 12:44 AM |