 Anyone here has 7.5" width rims with 25 offset???, pic please... |
 Mar 7, 2007 - 2:38 AM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Feb 3, '06 From Czech Republic (Europe) Currently Offline Reputation: 56 (100%)  |
I'm looking for pics of any rims, any size (15",16",17") but 7.5" width and ET25 (offset). Thanks...
-------------------- No more replicas... This is evolution... This is SS-four :)
 ________[Featured Celica of 6gc.net @ 2010]_________ |
 |
Replies
(1 - 10)
|
Mar 7, 2007 - 4:11 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From San Juan, PR Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
-------------------- Past - 7A-FTE: Will never forget you
Present - 3rd Gen 3S-GTE: Swap in progress QUOTE (SinisterSinner @ Dec 19, 2009 - 10:52 AM)  I dont want to even think of turbos, they blow up way too often... |
|
Mar 7, 2007 - 4:16 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 3, '06 From Czech Republic (Europe) Currently Offline Reputation: 56 (100%) |
QUOTE(OOBE @ Mar 7, 2007 - 10:11 AM) [snapback]533846[/snapback] OK... just make it clear... pics of rims on 6gen celica 
-------------------- No more replicas... This is evolution... This is SS-four :)
________[Featured Celica of 6gc.net @ 2010]_________ |
|
Mar 7, 2007 - 3:28 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Feb 5, '05 From pineapple under the sea Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) |
I don't think anyone is running that offset. That would stick out past the fenders pretty far. You would need to get some sort of fender flare to cover them up.
-------------------- 1991 MR2 - T-tops - Crimson Red - Gen3 3SGTE - Lots of money
 I'm not really an asshole, but I play one on the internet. **** Photobucket |
|
Mar 8, 2007 - 1:31 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 3, '06 From Czech Republic (Europe) Currently Offline Reputation: 56 (100%) |
according to my calculation it would exactly meet front fenders and be just really slightly sink in back. I can share with numbers
 QUOTE(95CelicaST @ Mar 7, 2007 - 9:28 PM) [snapback]533990[/snapback] I don't think anyone is running that offset. That would stick out past the fenders pretty far. You would need to get some sort of fender flare to cover them up. ...or I have better idea . See silver celi below: There are 7.5x16 ET35 rims used... My aim is 7.5x16 ET25 -> that's for 1cm (0.3937inch) less sink to the wheel arch... Do you really think wheels will stick out?
This post has been edited by malpaso: Mar 8, 2007 - 4:56 AM -------------------- No more replicas... This is evolution... This is SS-four :)
________[Featured Celica of 6gc.net @ 2010]_________ |
|
Mar 8, 2007 - 7:56 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Nov 25, '04 From Warsaw, Poland Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
They might not but they will definitely hit the fender edges on bumps.
-------------------- '94 ST202 - tuned, highly apprieciated, but sold.
'99 ST205 - imported, legalized, Stage 1 completed. For slow driving: Yamaha XVS650 Drag Star. The most recent addition to the family and for the family: Toyota RAV4 2.0 VVTi Celica-Club Poland - Everything you want to know about your favourite car ... in Polish |
|
Mar 8, 2007 - 9:08 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Sep 13, '04 From Sydney/Australia Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
martin,
offset is relative to ride height. although a +25 offset sounds like its going sticking out a hell lot. if not you may have some problems if you ever drop your car drastically. most poeple "roll" they're fenders. so they can fit in huge widths on the rear arch wheels. i had my mate's 17"s with im guessing +40 offset with my droped car and i has rubbing left right and centre. not good lol -------------------- ROM-23L 67 + 76 = 143
"I wasn't pursuing Sephiroth, I was being summoned by him." - Cloud Strife |
|
Mar 8, 2007 - 9:27 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) |
QUOTE(DSRT-FX @ Mar 8, 2007 - 9:08 AM) [snapback]534238[/snapback] martin, offset is relative to ride height. although a +25 offset sounds like its going sticking out a hell lot. if not you may have some problems if you ever drop your car drastically. most poeple "roll" they're fenders. so they can fit in huge widths on the rear arch wheels. i had my mate's 17"s with im guessing +40 offset with my droped car and i has rubbing left right and centre. not good lol rolling does not allow for huge wheels...rolling is merely smoothing the wheel arch lip out so you might get 1/4 to 1/2" more clearance to fit a huge wheel you would PULL the fenders, which requires lots of body work and new paint |
|
Mar 8, 2007 - 10:04 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Oct 28, '02 From Europe, Lithuania Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
+35 on 7.5 is almost MAX. I was running 7.5 with +35 ofset (r17) and in rear wheels where always hitting wheels arches...
-------------------- Ex celica owner - just a guy from other side of the pond...
Full custom Projects from restoration to performance builds <<<<<< DCw / JDMart >>>>>>> |
|
Mar 8, 2007 - 10:17 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 13, '04 From Sydney/Australia Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
QUOTE(playr158 @ Mar 9, 2007 - 1:27 AM) [snapback]534245[/snapback] QUOTE(DSRT-FX @ Mar 8, 2007 - 9:08 AM) [snapback]534238[/snapback] martin, offset is relative to ride height. although a +25 offset sounds like its going sticking out a hell lot. if not you may have some problems if you ever drop your car drastically. most poeple "roll" they're fenders. so they can fit in huge widths on the rear arch wheels. i had my mate's 17"s with im guessing +40 offset with my droped car and i has rubbing left right and centre. not good lol rolling does not allow for huge wheels...rolling is merely smoothing the wheel arch lip out so you might get 1/4 to 1/2" more clearance to fit a huge wheel you would PULL the fenders, which requires lots of body work and new paint i must agree rolling the guards and pulling the guards would take in huge wheels -R -------------------- ROM-23L 67 + 76 = 143
"I wasn't pursuing Sephiroth, I was being summoned by him." - Cloud Strife |
|
Mar 9, 2007 - 2:28 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 3, '06 From Czech Republic (Europe) Currently Offline Reputation: 56 (100%) |
QUOTE(DSRT-FX @ Mar 8, 2007 - 3:08 PM) [snapback]534238[/snapback] martin, offset is relative to ride height. although a +25 offset sounds like its going sticking out a hell lot. if not you may have some problems if you ever drop your car drastically. most poeple "roll" they're fenders. so they can fit in huge widths on the rear arch wheels. i had my mate's 17"s with im guessing +40 offset with my droped car and i has rubbing left right and centre. not good lol Rom, according to my calculations +25 at 7.5'' will not stick at all (ehm... actually there are few millimeters reserve  ). And I believe in my calculations... however...QUOTE(TomPoz @ Mar 8, 2007 - 1:56 PM) [snapback]534230[/snapback] They might not but they will definitely hit the fender edges on bumps. ...however you would be right Tom... fender edge... I have seen rolled one so it should be done...  that needs more numbers and informations... hmmm... QUOTE(doGGy @ Mar 8, 2007 - 4:04 PM) [snapback]534256[/snapback] +35 on 7.5 is almost MAX. I was running 7.5 with +35 ofset (r17) and in rear wheels where always hitting wheels arches... ...hmmm... That wheel arch... your car was for sure lowered, right? That must also have some impact... so lowering counts as well... -------------------- No more replicas... This is evolution... This is SS-four :)
________[Featured Celica of 6gc.net @ 2010]_________ |
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 27th, 2025 - 8:44 AM |