ultimate supra?, could very well be Options

[celicaST]

they should have left the headlights alone though. 1gz v12 twin turbo

http://www.caranddriver.com/autoshows/1236...cret-supra.html





edit- image fixed

This post has been edited by celicaST: Mar 7, 2007 - 3:56 AM

[QuintinGT]

Ultimate? yes its very unique and cool, but only 800 hp

[celicaST]

Ultimate? yes its very unique and cool, but only 800 hp

only? ya i know, ive seen more powerful and cleaner styled supras that i would much rather have personally. id rather take this 1uz v8 tt supra . but you cant beat the novelty of having a v12 under the hood.

[SlickRick]

give me the good ol 2jz-gte. i mean 1000hp is all i want! lol

[hurley97]

I like the Top Secret Celica in the background from Stevenson's post http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=45931

[Negative]

Oh there's that beautiful Celica again in the background of the first pic. Oh yeah and the Supra's nice too.

[azian_advanced]

i never knew there was a V12 engine by toyota in their production lineup.. that's crazy..

[Bigmeanbulldog55]

The ulimate Supra would have to be put on a serious diet and be powered by an aluminum block 3sgte or 5sgte. It's just mostly way to big. I don't understand why people glorify these cars.

[shin]

The ulimate Supra would have to be put on a serious diet and be powered by an aluminum block 3sgte or 5sgte. It's just mostly way to big. I don't understand why people glorify these cars.

why? cause we can't have it that's why.

[Negative]

Uh - I can - don't want it. RWD = sux IMO. Pretty cars but oversteer sux. What I really want I can't have - ST-205 GT4.

[jdg371]

OHH the CROWN V12 =] Yum.. I would much rather have this than a 2JZ.. if I wanted a 2JZ I would put in a MKII Supra.. Lightest Supra..

I like having the novelty of the V12.. also why do you need 1000HP?

[gt_driFFter]

The ulimate Supra would have to be put on a serious diet and be powered by an aluminum block 3sgte or 5sgte. It's just mostly way to big. I don't understand why people glorify these cars.

I could have swore I saw a picture of a celica and a supra next to each other, and the celica was bigger. They really aren't very big (size-wise) cars. As far as why people like them, there aren't that many cars that you can run an 8 second quarter mile, pushing 1400whp on a stock transmission and full interior

[j0e_p3t]

Uh - I can - don't want it. RWD = sux IMO. Pretty cars but oversteer sux. What I really want I can't have - ST-205 GT4.

x2. st205 ftw.

[gt_driFFter]

Uh - I can - don't want it. RWD = sux IMO. Pretty cars but oversteer sux.

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhahaabhwhabhabwhbhahbw

[OrbitalGT95]

Uh - I can - don't want it. RWD = sux IMO. Pretty cars but oversteer sux. What I really want I can't have - ST-205 GT4.

um, are u serious.....try racing a car before you say that....wow

[CelicaST202]

[quote name='Negative' date='Mar 7, 2007 - 4:06 PM' post='534011']
Uh - I can - don't want it. RWD = sux IMO. Pretty cars but oversteer sux. What I really want I can't have - ST-205 GT4.
[/quote

wow please explain why RWD= sux



This post has been edited by CelicaST202: Mar 8, 2007 - 1:37 AM

[neKronos]

rather please don't

[Negative]

[quote name='gt_driFFter' date='Mar 8, 2007 - 4:57 AM' post='534169']
[quote name='Negative' post='534011' date='Mar 7, 2007 - 6:06 PM']
Uh - I can - don't want it. RWD = sux IMO. Pretty cars but oversteer sux. [/quote]

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhahaabhwhabhabwhbhahbw
[/quote]


[quote name='OrbitalGT95' date='Mar 8, 2007 - 6:19 AM' post='534197']
[quote name='Negative' post='534011' date='Mar 7, 2007 - 9:06 PM']
Uh - I can - don't want it. RWD = sux IMO. Pretty cars but oversteer sux. What I really want I can't have - ST-205 GT4.
[/quote]


um, are u serious.....try racing a car before you say that....wow
[/quote]


[quote name='CelicaST202' date='Mar 8, 2007 - 6:36 AM' post='534202']
[quote name='Negative' date='Mar 7, 2007 - 4:06 PM' post='534011']
Uh - I can - don't want it. RWD = sux IMO. Pretty cars but oversteer sux. What I really want I can't have - ST-205 GT4.
[/quote

wow please explain why RWD= sux
[/quote]


[quote name='neKronos' date='Mar 8, 2007 - 1:39 PM' post='534232']
rather please don't
[/quote]

And you guys are how old? I've been racing cars since the early nineties [teenage years] and I run a club with 300+ Toyotas including MR2's, Supras and Celica's of all gens - all drive types. I have gotten to beat on at least one of each and Furthermore I have owned 2 RWD Celicas incuding MKII Celica/Supra. In the end AWD owns all for handling and power transmission to the ground with stability. Have you ever driven a MKII MR2 T? I doubt most of you have. If you had - you would know what I'm talking about.
I also have driven many american muscle cars with tons of HP - same result. AWD owns all.
Speak up when you know what you are talking about.
BTW - Nice mods ya'll. I think I see a short ram intake and some rims between the 4 of you. Try modding a car before you speak up.

This post has been edited by Negative: Mar 8, 2007 - 10:29 AM

[playr158]

that article is actually wrong...

that supra makes 1000whp inorder to achieve the owners maximum speed goal of 248 or 249mph....

which was specifically designed and built to out do his previous skyline project


and RWD only oversteers if you didn't setup your suspension right......

This post has been edited by playr158: Mar 8, 2007 - 10:13 AM

[CelicaST202]

this is too funny hahhhaaa