Jan 12, 2010 - 9:17 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 24, '08 From Orange County, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 33 (100%) |
I was wondering what the purpose of the final drive gear ratio?
also what is this? http://auctions.nengun.com/item/k113042803 -------------------- Group buy to replicate Narrow E series transaxle parts
http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...p;#entry1107514 Items for Sale: http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...p;#entry1107572 |
![]() |
Sep 6, 2011 - 8:39 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 24, '08 From Orange County, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 33 (100%) |
I got the information from this link : http://www.rubydist.com/Family/Power.html
A second way to improve acceleration is to put a higher (numerically) ratio final drive in the vehicle. The torque available at the drive wheels is the engine torque multiplied by the transmission ratio multiplied by the final drive ratio. Let's just use some hypothetical numbers to make the math easy. Let's say for an example that the engine has 200 lb-ft of torque all across the usable speed range (a gross oversimplification); let's have a final drive ratio of 3:1, a rolling radius of 1.25' (15" radius, 30" diameter tire); and let's say that the transmission ratios are 3:1 (1st), 2:1 (2nd), 1.5:1 (3rd), 1:1 (4th), and .75:1 (5th). -So, the torque available at drive wheels in first gear is 200 (engine torque) x 3 (first gear ratio) x 3 (final drive ratio) = 1800 lb-ft. (The force at the point where the drive wheels contact the road is a total of 1800 lb-ft / 1.25 ft (rolling radius) = 1440 lb.) If we change the final drive ratio to 4:1, the first gear torque will be 200 x 3 (first gear ratio) x 4 (final drive ratio) = 2400 lb-ft. This is a 33% increase in drive wheel torque, and it will result in dramatically improved acceleration. (It will also increase engine speed on the highway, resulting in lower fuel mileage, increased noise & engine wear, and a lowered top speed of the vehicle.) The final drive ratio has no effect on the horsepower of the vehicle, but it does affect the torque available to the drive wheels. Stock S54 Gear Ratios: 1st : 3.285 2nd: 1.960 3rd: 1.322 4th: 1.028 5th: .820 Final Drive: 4.176 Using this equation, (engine torque) x (first gear ratio) x (final drive ratio) = # of pounds. Then # of pounds / rolling tire radius in feet = gives you # of wheel torque. I am using my current 215/45R17 tire size = 2.06 ft in diameter. Final Drive 4.176 (Stock S54) = 1012.21 pounds Final Drive 4.562 (96-2000 Rav4 E250) = 1105.78 pounds Final Drive 4.933 (96-2000 Rav4 E250F) = 1195.70 pounds Increase in torque from 4.176 - 4.529 is 9.24%. Increase in torque from 4.562 - 4.933 is 8.92% Increase in torque from 4.176 - 4.933 is 18.14% Which means a 4.933 final drive in your s54 transmission will gain 27 ft lb torque + 152 = 179 ft lb tq This post has been edited by BonzaiCelica: Oct 16, 2017 - 5:32 AM -------------------- Group buy to replicate Narrow E series transaxle parts
http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...p;#entry1107514 Items for Sale: http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...p;#entry1107572 |
May 6, 2017 - 9:00 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined May 6, '17 From Australia Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Does anyone know if the ring and pinion from the 4.933 Final Drive out of the E250F transmission has a suitable ring and pinion for the S54 box?
I would dearly love it if this is the case! I came up with these calculations can anybody back this up?? I got the information from this link : http://www.rubydist.com/Family/Power.html
this is what I read from the link, and how I came up with the calculations: A second way to improve acceleration is to put a higher (numerically) ratio final drive in the vehicle. The torque available at the drive wheels is the engine torque multiplied by the transmission ratio multiplied by the final drive ratio. Let's just use some hypothetical numbers to make the math easy. Let's say for an example that the engine has 200 lb-ft of torque all across the usable speed range (a gross oversimplification); let's have a final drive ratio of 3:1, a rolling radius of 1.25' (15" radius, 30" diameter tire); and let's say that the transmission ratios are 3:1 (1st), 2:1 (2nd), 1.5:1 (3rd), 1:1 (4th), and .75:1 (5th). -So, the torque available at drive wheels in first gear is 200 (engine torque) x 3 (first gear ratio) x 3 (final drive ratio) = 1800 lb-ft. (The force at the point where the drive wheels contact the road is a total of 1800 lb-ft / 1.25 ft (rolling radius) = 1440 lb.) If we change the final drive ratio to 4:1, the first gear torque will be 200 x 3 (first gear ratio) x 4 (final drive ratio) = 2400 lb-ft. This is a 33% increase in drive wheel torque, and it will result in dramatically improved acceleration. (It will also increase engine speed on the highway, resulting in lower fuel mileage, increased noise & engine wear, and a lowered top speed of the vehicle.) The final drive ratio has no effect on the horsepower of the vehicle, but it does affect the torque available to the drive wheels. My Mathematics skills says: Stock S54 Gear Ratios: 1st : 3.285 2nd: 1.960 3rd: 1.322 4th: 1.028 5th: .820 Final Drive: 4.176 Using this equation, (engine torque) x (first gear ratio) x (final drive ratio) = # of pounds. Then # of pounds / rolling tire radius in feet = gives you # of wheel torque. I am using my current 215/45R17 tire size = 2.06 ft in diameter. So here is the difference in torque. Final Drive 4.176 (Stock S54) = 1012.21 pounds Final Drive 4.562 (96-2000 Rav4 E250) = 1105.78 pounds Final Drive 4.933 (96-2000 Rav4 E250F) = 1195.70 pounds Increase in torque from 4.176 - 4.529 is 9.24%. Increase in torque from 4.562 - 4.933 is 8.92% Increase in torque from 4.176 - 4.933 is 18.14% Which means a 4.933 final drive in your s54 transmission will gain 27 ft lb torque + 152 = 179 ft lb tq http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTLPZ1bVgHs the beams sounds even better revving up past 8000rpm, its pretty interesting but in japan they raced the ss3 celica's in n1 endurance racing and you cant modify the engine for that, they used a 8400rpm rev limit, the heads will produce peak power at 8600 rpm with no modifications, but due to piston speed at that point its better to keep it to 8000rpm, its an engine with great potential, as soon as you fit an aftermarket ecu to them they come alive. If i'd kept mine any longer i'd have matched the increased rev limit to an e56 gearbox with 4.9 final drive which would have given the same top speed in each gear as the stock car, but nearly 20% more torque at the wheels, eat your heart out v6 owners muahahahaha see even EDOPHUS thought the same thing i did 2 years before i even posted this. This post has been edited by sir_smeghed: Jun 9, 2017 - 6:30 AM |
Jun 9, 2017 - 5:30 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined May 6, '17 From Australia Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
PLEASE! Someone.....
I have an SW20 with an F20C engine (honda S2000) so it's got a 9000 rpm redline with Vtec kicking in at 6000 rpm. For this power to be usable on the track I will need something closer to a 4.9 final gear, I want to keep the S54 box as it is lighter, handles the power well and has nice gearing and I can't really afford to re-engineer the entire setup. Does the ring gear from the E250F (4.933) transfer directly into the S54???? This post has been edited by sir_smeghed: Jun 9, 2017 - 6:44 AM |
BonzaiCelica Gear Ratios Jan 12, 2010 - 9:17 PM
Edophus QUOTE (BonzaiCelica @ Jan 13, 2010 - 2... Jan 13, 2010 - 5:38 AM
BonzaiCelica thanks edophus. So do you think the gearing for th... Jan 13, 2010 - 11:17 AM
Edophus QUOTE (BonzaiCelica @ Jan 13, 2010 - 4... Jan 13, 2010 - 11:34 AM
Mstoochn the S54 also cruises on the HWY at 3500RPM the RS... Jan 13, 2010 - 7:50 PM
Edophus QUOTE (Mstoochn @ Jan 14, 2010 - 12... Jan 14, 2010 - 5:21 AM
pittfirefighter camry e153 ftw Jan 13, 2010 - 9:27 PM
Mstoochn best idealistic trans i can think of for an NA 3s/... Jan 14, 2010 - 5:46 AM
Edophus QUOTE (Mstoochn @ Jan 14, 2010 - 10... Jan 14, 2010 - 6:29 AM
BonzaiCelica i just looked up this gear ratio calculator. can a... Mar 4, 2010 - 7:22 AM
azian_advanced QUOTE (BonzaiCelica @ Mar 4, 2010 - 6... Mar 7, 2010 - 9:47 PM
BonzaiCelica anybody ^ Mar 7, 2010 - 5:54 PM
Rusty Im a bit baffled about the e56 being able go have ... Mar 7, 2010 - 11:59 PM
BonzaiCelica useless and incorrect information.... Sep 6, 2011 - 2:17 AM
slavie QUOTE (sir_smeghed @ Jun 9, 2017 - 5... Jun 9, 2017 - 9:49 AM
sir_smeghed That helps a lot, thanks.
Since I left my last po... Jun 9, 2017 - 10:58 PM
azian_advanced i think you have the general idea.. but just remem... Sep 6, 2011 - 11:46 PM
BonzaiCelica no I am very well aware of the shorter gears that ... Sep 7, 2011 - 12:43 AM
Ted95 QUOTE (BonzaiCelica @ Sep 7, 2011 - 1... Apr 30, 2012 - 10:49 AM
mkernz22 QUOTE (Ted95 @ Apr 30, 2012 - 11:49 ... Apr 30, 2012 - 11:15 AM
BonzaiCelica someone help me put this to rest... so does the c ... May 7, 2012 - 11:24 PM
BonzaiCelica ok ok this is the one. BUMP May 13, 2012 - 1:06 AM
BonzaiCelica Which one of these pieces is the pinion? I know th... Jul 3, 2012 - 4:31 PM
BonzaiCelica bump!! Jul 5, 2012 - 3:58 PM
rdyzz sorry to review a dead thread, just try to get mor... Jan 15, 2013 - 8:41 PM
BonzaiCelica OEM s54 ring count is 71 teeth and pinion is 17 te... Jan 15, 2013 - 9:32 PM
rdyzz the output shaft gears look smaller than the s54... Jan 16, 2013 - 4:35 PM
BonzaiCelica Output shaft part numbers :
S54 transmission : 3... Mar 20, 2014 - 9:52 PM
mi645 im running e56 i like the trans but the gears r a ... Mar 21, 2014 - 2:54 AM
BonzaiCelica Final Drive Ring Gear specs :
S55F transmission :... Mar 22, 2014 - 3:04 AM
mkernz22 https://partsouq.com/en/catalog/toyota/part...... Mar 26, 2014 - 9:46 PM
mkernz22 ooooo, more info.
http://www.newcelica.org/forum... Mar 26, 2014 - 10:08 PM
BonzaiCelica QUOTE (mkernz22 @ Mar 26, 2014 - 10... Mar 26, 2014 - 11:06 PM
BonzaiCelica blah, useless info Mar 10, 2017 - 6:33 PM
slavie So were you ever able to rule out if C56 pinion wo... Mar 24, 2017 - 10:13 PM
BonzaiCelica it wouldn't work look at the part numbers.... Mar 27, 2017 - 1:03 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 16th, 2025 - 6:18 PM |