![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Feb 10, '06 From Chile Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
well here is the deal....maybe in 1 or 2 months i may have the chance to change my 6g celi st hatchback 95 (auto)for a 2g (97) mitsubishi eclipse gst(manual), i was analizing the pros and cons of the car change considerating price and stuff (if i get the eclipse i wont be able to sell it for a while), im thinking about getting the eclispe but while i decide i thought that it might be a good idea to post it here so i can read your opinions why you would or wouldnt do it...
both cars are in excellent condition any experiences? opinions? thoughts? are welcome (here is a list of things i consider) -the mitsu has almost double power considerating its a lil more heavier -mitsu engine...you cant give it even 1 extra hp or engine blows, comes to the limit, very low mechanical upgrades, in the other hand the celi is fully customisable -the always economy vs preformance and power vs durability of components -externally the mitsu its a lot less externally modificable -the celi has 1 minor hit wich i think it has no colateral effect on the car, the mitsu is hit free This post has been edited by DeathWing: Aug 5, 2006 - 6:31 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jul 6, '06 Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
stick w/ teh celi.....everyone ive know that has/ had a eclipse says they suck, and most of them are done after 80,000 miles or soo. they just....die.
celica all the way, who cares if the other one is faster. celica looks cooler -------------------- ![]() KB |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: June 4th, 2025 - 10:32 AM |