Feb 15, 2008 - 1:19 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 20, '07 From Bakersfield, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 10 (100%) |
Search, search, search. What the funk ever. Dude, I can't even find the guy who is selling the bulbs for the freaking speedometer gauges (if you can direct him for me, that would be awesome, unless you know a better way). Anyways, I was wondering if a complete front clip is all I need (as far as parts go), or would I need other things? Was it worth it (money and time wise) in the end? Is there a better way to get more speed out of your celica than just that conversion and swap? Is just the swap more sensible? Bigger engine? What kind? Spit your knowledge for me here, so I have one source to save and always go back to.
Thanks, Faust -------------------- 91 MR2 Turbo SW20, 92 MR2 Turbo SW20, 95 Celica GT ST204
![]() |
![]() |
Feb 15, 2008 - 11:34 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 20, '07 From Bakersfield, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 10 (100%) |
Cool thanks. And for the record, I realize I am not any where near ready for AWD or even the engine swap itself. I am just gaining confidence (that I never had before) with the small things I am going to be doing with my car. Happy to fix things that break, rather than be upset for the misfortune. Right now the radiator went out, so I am ordering a Koyo aluminum one and things like that. Shocks need to be replaced and I am picking up my kyb ones from ups, but I won't install them until I decide on what springs to go with, and if I can make it to Mr. Jeff Lews or not. I am sure I might be able to install those though. How hard can it be?
More power to run all 4 wheels and slower? I kind of pictured it like a person pulling themselves or climbing. FWD would be just your arms. RWD would be just your legs. AWD arms and legs. Know what I mean? Since FWD the car is pulling itself, RWD it is pushing itself and yeah... This post has been edited by Random_Stranger: Feb 15, 2008 - 11:37 AM -------------------- 91 MR2 Turbo SW20, 92 MR2 Turbo SW20, 95 Celica GT ST204
![]() |
Feb 15, 2008 - 1:29 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Random_Stranger @ Feb 15, 2008 - 4:34 PM) [snapback]641770[/snapback] More power to run all 4 wheels and slower? I kind of pictured it like a person pulling themselves or climbing. FWD would be just your arms. RWD would be just your legs. AWD arms and legs. Know what I mean? Since FWD the car is pulling itself, RWD it is pushing itself and yeah... Hehehehehe... terrible analogy. Arms and legs each have their own set of muscles to pull. Wheels do NOT. They share the same muscle (engine) so in effect, you have to split available power to more places than before... not to mention you're also adding weight with the AWD set-up. The ONLY argument for AWD is traction. As said before... if you can't even find gauge cluster bulbs, which are 194 type bulbs, you're DEFINATELY not going be doing an AWD swap any time soon. -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
Random_Stranger For those of you who have AWD Conversions Feb 15, 2008 - 1:19 AM
xs94st http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...5137... Feb 15, 2008 - 1:25 AM
Random_Stranger Thanks. I would look but after a bit, all things ... Feb 15, 2008 - 2:35 AM
MaskedMan You can't find light bulbs and you want to do ... Feb 15, 2008 - 8:12 AM
_mikeE Good call MaskedMan, I was gonna say the same but ... Feb 15, 2008 - 9:53 AM
_mikeE with FWD you only lose about 15-20% power due to t... Feb 15, 2008 - 1:52 PM
xs94st if u have the fundamental knowledge of AWD vehicle... Feb 15, 2008 - 2:31 PM
Random_Stranger Well thanks for all this guys. I envy you for you... Feb 15, 2008 - 3:21 PM
_mikeE Hey man, that's what we're here for to hel... Feb 15, 2008 - 4:30 PM
Random_Stranger QUOTE(_mikeE @ Feb 15, 2008 - 9:30 P... Feb 15, 2008 - 4:38 PM
_mikeE Well, if you turbo your 5S motor you're averag... Feb 15, 2008 - 4:49 PM
MaskedMan Actually parts to turbo the 5s is closer to around... Feb 15, 2008 - 5:26 PM
_mikeE Which is why Random_stranger, you should just spen... Feb 15, 2008 - 5:54 PM
MaskedMan QUOTE(_mikeE @ Feb 15, 2008 - 2:54 P... Feb 15, 2008 - 6:13 PM
Random_Stranger Yeah, if and when I decide I am capable of this pr... Feb 15, 2008 - 8:16 PM
addictions ok so the tranny in the Gt bolts up to the 3s moto... Feb 17, 2008 - 7:28 PM
_mikeE the E153 tranny is from the mr2 turbo which is a m... Feb 18, 2008 - 2:10 AM
addictions QUOTE(_mikeE @ Feb 18, 2008 - 2:10 A... Feb 19, 2008 - 12:14 AM
_mikeE I believe the E153 tranny is a direct bolt to the ... Feb 19, 2008 - 12:34 AM
addictions QUOTE(_mikeE @ Feb 19, 2008 - 12:34 ... Feb 19, 2008 - 7:05 PM
_mikeE I believe the E153 tranny should bolt right up to ... Feb 20, 2008 - 1:19 AM
lagos QUOTE(addictions @ Feb 19, 2008 - 7... Feb 20, 2008 - 12:43 PM
_mikeE Jee, i haven't really done much research upon ... Feb 20, 2008 - 9:53 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: October 26th, 2025 - 3:04 PM |