![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 1, '03 From Michigan Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Twin charger setups were attempted by a number of 1st gen MR2 owners. Most complained of the extra complexity caused more trouble then benifit. Of course that was almost 20 years ago.
If you want a huge turbo to give you that massive top end, and something for that low end quickness then get nos - the quicker spooler upper! -------------------- Scott
West Michigan |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() Joined Jan 9, '05 From connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) ![]() |
yeah i guess NOS would work wonders for that.
|
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) ![]() |
ok #1) its not NOS thats a brand....its called nitrous...
its complicated, it takes time and effort and of course money...its in the long run CHEAPER then filling up a dumb bottle 100 times over in a season...its ALWAYS on and probably less stress on the motor... think outside drag racing for a moment....like road coarse..how long do you think a bottle of nitrous is going to last you? |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 6, '05 From PA Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(playr158 @ Apr 9, 2006 - 8:16 PM) [snapback]419525[/snapback] ok #1) its not NOS thats a brand....its called nitrous... its complicated, it takes time and effort and of course money...its in the long run CHEAPER then filling up a dumb bottle 100 times over in a season...its ALWAYS on and probably less stress on the motor... think outside drag racing for a moment....like road coarse..how long do you think a bottle of nitrous is going to last you? QFT -------------------- |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 1, '03 From Michigan Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE ok #1) its not NOS thats a brand....its called nitrous... And yet, when I say NOS everyone knows what I'm talking about. QUOTE its complicated, it takes time and effort and of course money...its in the long run CHEAPER then filling up a dumb bottle 100 times over in a season...its ALWAYS on and probably less stress on the motor... These people talking about twin turbos / twin charging a motor - very complicated and very expensive. For twin turbo you have a custom manifold, exhaust, intercooler system, full EMS and a ton of R&D time to find complementing turbo's and get them working together. For a twin charger you have a supercharger (obviously), full ems, and properly sized turbo. Not cheap, not easy. This post has been edited by scothaniel: Apr 10, 2006 - 10:03 AM -------------------- Scott
West Michigan |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE These people talking about twin turbos / twin charging a motor - very complicated and very expensive. For twin turbo you have a custom manifold, exhaust, intercooler system, full EMS and a ton of R&D time to find complementing turbo's and get them working together. For a twin charger you have a supercharger (obviously), full ems, and properly sized turbo. Not cheap, not easy. thats wat i said.....its not easy..its not supposed to be...read my words QUOTE its complicated, it takes time and effort and of course money thats not wat i was talking about...my point was the a twin charged operation is more feasable for say a road coarse, street car......where as a larger turbo that used nitrous would be more suitable for the drag strip 2 applications 2 different purposes.... you have to think about aspects of each side 1)nitrous is sharp, short lived, not usable over any period longer then a few seconds, bottle life/time, filling expenses, damage replacement costs 2) twin charging, standalone, fuel, manifolds...more stable over longer durations, each has its own place and each has pros and cons....i was simply stateing to think beyond drag(spooling with nitrous) to the other arenas of motorsports... example....i've seen a supra that used a 100 sumthing shot of nitrous to spool his larger bird eater turbo....but it was only good for a straight line...he would be up the creek w/o a paddle on any other course... This post has been edited by playr158: Apr 10, 2006 - 10:12 AM |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Jun 6, '05 From Texas/Hawaii Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(bloodrain @ Apr 9, 2006 - 8:24 AM) [snapback]419389[/snapback] the ONLY advantage of having a TT setup is... it sounds more aggresive. "My 500 horsepower, twin turbo pinto" vs. "My 500 horsepower turboed pinto." Pinto Fo Lyfe. ha ha thatz tight. 500 hp pinto. all i would say is woah **** if i saw one roll by -------------------- I gotz 2 things my celi and a dream, the prob is commin up with the thrid one...
|
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 17, '05 From The Netherlands Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Volkwagens New Golf, gonna be released in the US as the new Rabbit. Has a Super and turbo charged eninge. Called the Golf TSI GT
Its a 1.4L with 170 bhp. The Supercharger is used untill 2900-3000 RPM then the turbo kicks in to 6000 RPM. With a heavier car then mine. Its faster of the line ![]() ![]() -------------------- JDM Powerplant installed, BPU coming very soon!
|
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 5, '03 From South TX. Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) ![]() |
......somebody use the 3rd gen RX7's sequential twin setup please!:P
|
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 17, '04 From Boston, MA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
Sequential not possible. Twins possible.
http://www.madpsi.net/ProjectMR2.htm I hear the kit is not longer available though. ![]() Regards; |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 20th, 2025 - 7:59 PM |